Bilateral gait asymmetry associated with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis versus ankle arthrodesis.
Details
Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_01855DF69687
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Bilateral gait asymmetry associated with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis versus ankle arthrodesis.
Journal
Foot and ankle surgery
ISSN
1460-9584 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1268-7731
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
27
Number
3
Pages
332-338
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Gait asymmetries have been reported following ankle arthrodesis. However, similar reports do not exist for tibiotalocalaneal arthrodesis (TTCA), which involves further articular fusion. This study aimed to assess the extent of gait asymmetry following TTCA when compared to ankle arthrodesis.
Gait assessment was performed on 36 participants, including 12 ankle arthrodesis, 12 TTCA and 12 controls - using 3-D inertial sensors and pressure insoles. 48 gait parameters were monitored on both operated and non-operated sides. Questionnaires including AOFAS, FAAM, EQ-5D were used to assess both operative groups, comparatively.
Both operative groups reported significantly smaller stride, slower walking speed, altered stance phase with longer loading and shorter push-off compared to controls. Joint range of motion was significantly reduced on the operated side of both operative groups at hindfoot, forefoot and toe intersegments. However, the ankle arthrodesis group reported a significantly higher alteration compared to controls in maximum contact force and pressure distribution. Furthermore, bilateral comparison showed extended gait asymmetry in the ankle arthrodesis group with 29 out of 48 parameters being significantly different between the two sides, whereas only 16 out of 48 gait parameters showed bilateral difference in the TTCA group.
Both ankle salvage operations led to significant gait alteration and bilateral asymmetry. However, extended joint restriction in TTCA does not seem to worsen the gait outcomes. Further investigation is needed to understand the long-term impact of altered gait, on neighboring joints, following TTCA.
Gait assessment was performed on 36 participants, including 12 ankle arthrodesis, 12 TTCA and 12 controls - using 3-D inertial sensors and pressure insoles. 48 gait parameters were monitored on both operated and non-operated sides. Questionnaires including AOFAS, FAAM, EQ-5D were used to assess both operative groups, comparatively.
Both operative groups reported significantly smaller stride, slower walking speed, altered stance phase with longer loading and shorter push-off compared to controls. Joint range of motion was significantly reduced on the operated side of both operative groups at hindfoot, forefoot and toe intersegments. However, the ankle arthrodesis group reported a significantly higher alteration compared to controls in maximum contact force and pressure distribution. Furthermore, bilateral comparison showed extended gait asymmetry in the ankle arthrodesis group with 29 out of 48 parameters being significantly different between the two sides, whereas only 16 out of 48 gait parameters showed bilateral difference in the TTCA group.
Both ankle salvage operations led to significant gait alteration and bilateral asymmetry. However, extended joint restriction in TTCA does not seem to worsen the gait outcomes. Further investigation is needed to understand the long-term impact of altered gait, on neighboring joints, following TTCA.
Keywords
Ankle fusion, Asymmetry, Motion sensors, Retrograde ankle nail, Salvage operation
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
11/01/2021 11:33
Last modification date
20/07/2022 5:39