Leniency programs, antitrust enforcement and multimarket contact : three essays in industrial organization

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_00741E0D27EE.P001.pdf (1461.11 [Ko])
Etat: Serval
Version: Après imprimatur
ID Serval
serval:BIB_00741E0D27EE
Type
Thèse: thèse de doctorat.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Leniency programs, antitrust enforcement and multimarket contact : three essays in industrial organization
Auteur(s)
Roux C.
Directeur(s)
von Ungern-Sternberg T.
Institution
Université de Lausanne, Faculté des hautes études commerciales
Adresse
HEC Lausanne Quartier UNIL-Dorigny Bâtiment Internef CH - 1015 Lausanne
Statut éditorial
Acceptée
Date de publication
05/2010
Langue
anglais
Nombre de pages
91
Notes
REROID:R005461334
Résumé
The Layout of My Thesis
This thesis contains three chapters in Industrial Organization that build on the work outlined above. The first two chapters combine leniency programs with multimarket contact and provide a thorough analysis of the potential effects of Amnesty Plus and Penalty Plus. The third chapter puts the whole discussion on leniency programs into perspective by examining other enforcement tools available to an antitrust authority. The main argument in that last chapter is that a specific instrument can only be as effective as the policy in which it is embedded. It is therefore important for an antitrust authority to know how it best accompanies the introduction or modification of a policy instrument that helps deterrence.
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1 examines the efféct of Amnesty Plus and Penalty Plus on the incentives of firms to report cartel activities. The main question is whether the inclusion of these policies in a leniency program undermine the effectiveness of the latter by discouraging the firms to apply for amnesty. The model is static and focus on the ex post incentives of firms to desist from collusion. The results suggest that, because Amnesty Plus and Penalty Plus encourage the reporting of a second cartel after a first detection, a firm, anticipating this, may be reluctant to seek leniency and to report in the first place. However, the effect may also go in the opposite direction, and Amnesty Plus and Penalty Plus may encourage the simultaneous reporting of two cartels.
Chapter 2 takes this idea further to the stage of cartel formation. This chapter provides a complete characterization of the potential anticompetitive and procompetitive effects of Amnesty Plus in a infinitely repeated game framework when the firms use their multimarket contact to harshen punishment. I suggest a clear-cut policy rule that prevents potential adverse effects and thereby show that, if policy makers follow this rule, a leniency program with Amnesty Plus performs better than one without.
Chapter 3 characterizes the socially optimal enforcement effort of an antitrust authority and shows how this effort changes with the introduction or modification of specific policy instruments. The intuition is that the policy instrument may increase the marginal benefit of conducting investigations. If this effect is strong enough, a more rigorous detection policy becomes socially desirable.
Création de la notice
16/08/2010 16:56
Dernière modification de la notice
03/03/2018 13:11
Données d'usage