Diagnostic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection and interpretation of microbiological results.
Détails
Télécharger: 32593741_BIB_EB349E4D572A.pdf (668.06 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_EB349E4D572A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Diagnostic strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection and interpretation of microbiological results.
Périodique
Clinical microbiology and infection
ISSN
1469-0691 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1198-743X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Numéro
9
Pages
1178-1182
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To face the current COVID-19 pandemic, diagnostic tools are essential. It is recommended to use real-time RT-PCR for RNA viruses in order (a) to perform a rapid and accurate diagnostic, (b) to guide patient care and management and (c) to guide epidemiological strategies. Further studies are warranted to define the role of serological diagnosis and a possible correlation between serological response and prognosis.
The aim was to guide clinical microbiologists in the use of these diagnostic tests and clinicians in the interpretation of their results.
A search of literature was performed through PubMed and Google Scholar using the keywords SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis, SARS-CoV-2 immune response, SARS-CoV-2 serology/antibody testing, coronavirus diagnosis.
The present review discusses performances, limitations and use of current and future diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2.
Real-time RT-PCR remains the reference method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the other hand, notwithstanding its varying sensitivity according to the time of infection, serology represents a valid asset (a) to try to solve possible discrepancies between a highly suggestive clinical and radiological presentation and negative RT-PCR, (b) to solve discrepancies between different PCR assays and (c) for epidemiological purposes.
The aim was to guide clinical microbiologists in the use of these diagnostic tests and clinicians in the interpretation of their results.
A search of literature was performed through PubMed and Google Scholar using the keywords SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnosis, SARS-CoV-2 immune response, SARS-CoV-2 serology/antibody testing, coronavirus diagnosis.
The present review discusses performances, limitations and use of current and future diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2.
Real-time RT-PCR remains the reference method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the other hand, notwithstanding its varying sensitivity according to the time of infection, serology represents a valid asset (a) to try to solve possible discrepancies between a highly suggestive clinical and radiological presentation and negative RT-PCR, (b) to solve discrepancies between different PCR assays and (c) for epidemiological purposes.
Mots-clé
Antibodies, Viral/blood, COVID-19/diagnosis, COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing, COVID-19 Serological Testing, COVID-19 Testing/methods, Humans, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, COVID-19, Coronavirus, Molecular diagnostic testing, Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, SARS-COV-2, Serology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
03/07/2020 16:48
Dernière modification de la notice
21/11/2022 8:27