Comparison of different machine learning models to enhance sacral acceleration-based estimations of running stride temporal variables and peak vertical ground reaction force.
Détails
Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_E54F3E7AE60A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of different machine learning models to enhance sacral acceleration-based estimations of running stride temporal variables and peak vertical ground reaction force.
Périodique
Sports biomechanics
ISSN
1752-6116 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1476-3141
Statut éditorial
In Press
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Résumé
Machine learning (ML) was used to predict contact ( ) and flight ( ) time, duty factor (DF) and peak vertical force ( ) from IMU-based estimations. One hundred runners ran on an instrumented treadmill (9-13 km/h) while wearing a sacral-mounted IMU. Linear regression (LR), support vector regression and two-layer neural-network were trained (80 participants) using IMU-based estimations, running speed, stride frequency and body mass. Predictions (remaining 20 participants) were compared to gold standard (kinetic data collected using the force plate) by calculating the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). MAPEs of did not significantly differ among its estimation and predictions (P = 0.37), while prediction MAPEs for , and DF were significantly smaller than corresponding estimation MAPEs (P ≤ 0.003). There were no significant differences among prediction MAPEs obtained from the three ML models (P ≥ 0.80). Errors of the ML models were equal to or smaller than (≤32%) the smallest real difference for the four variables, while errors of the estimations were not (15-45%), indicating that ML models were sufficiently accurate to detect a clinically important difference. The simplest ML model (LR) should be used to improve the accuracy of the IMU-based estimations. These improvements may be beneficial when monitoring running-related injury risk factors in real-world settings.
Mots-clé
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomechanics, contact time, duty factor, inertial measurement unit, running injuries
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
08/01/2023 20:44
Dernière modification de la notice
27/07/2024 6:00