Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain.
Détails
Télécharger: 39098266.pdf (3503.30 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_D81B3C5286B3
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain.
Périodique
Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN
1472-6491 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1472-6483
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
10/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
49
Numéro
4
Pages
104321
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Systematic Review ; Meta-Analysis ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been demonstrated to reduce endometriosis-associated pain. Because of the hypo-oestrogenic state they induce, however, higher dosages of GnRH antagonists are not recommended for used long term. This unwanted effect may be eliminated by so-called add-back therapy (ABT). This review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of GnRH antagonists, with or without add-back hormonal replacement therapy. Out of the 345 studies selected through the initial search, seven randomized controlled trials were included, comparing different oral GnRH antagonists at varying dosages, from a minimum of 50 mg to a maximum of 200 mg once or twice daily. Women treated with the lowest dose of GnRH antagonists had significantly greater mean pain score reductions from baseline throughout treatment compared with those treated with placebo (odds ratio [OR] -13.12, 95% CI -17.35 to -8.89 and OR -3.08, 95% CI -4.39 to -1.76 for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, respectively). Compatible with the dose-response effect, a positive correlation was found between response rates and adverse event rates. While GnRH antagonists offer an advantage in terms of pain reduction for endometriosis, the more recent literature suggests using GnRH antagonists with ABT, which, while mitigating the hypo-oestrogenic effects of GnRH antagonists, maintain their efficacy, while allowing their long-term use.
Mots-clé
Humans, Endometriosis/drug therapy, Endometriosis/complications, Female, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors, Pelvic Pain/drug therapy, Pelvic Pain/etiology, Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use, Estrogens/therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Add-back, Dysmenorrhoea, Endometriosis, Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists, Pelvic pain
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
09/08/2024 14:25
Dernière modification de la notice
21/09/2024 6:21