Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 39098266.pdf (3503.30 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_D81B3C5286B3
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Why do oestrogens matter: systematic review and meta-analysis assessing GnRH antagonists, considering add-back therapy, for endometriosis-associated pain.
Journal
Reproductive biomedicine online
Author(s)
Viviano M., Benagiano G., Guo S.W., Pluchino N.
ISSN
1472-6491 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1472-6483
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
49
Number
4
Pages
104321
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Systematic Review ; Meta-Analysis ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been demonstrated to reduce endometriosis-associated pain. Because of the hypo-oestrogenic state they induce, however, higher dosages of GnRH antagonists are not recommended for used long term. This unwanted effect may be eliminated by so-called add-back therapy (ABT). This review was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of GnRH antagonists, with or without add-back hormonal replacement therapy. Out of the 345 studies selected through the initial search, seven randomized controlled trials were included, comparing different oral GnRH antagonists at varying dosages, from a minimum of 50 mg to a maximum of 200 mg once or twice daily. Women treated with the lowest dose of GnRH antagonists had significantly greater mean pain score reductions from baseline throughout treatment compared with those treated with placebo (odds ratio [OR] -13.12, 95% CI -17.35 to -8.89 and OR -3.08, 95% CI -4.39 to -1.76 for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, respectively). Compatible with the dose-response effect, a positive correlation was found between response rates and adverse event rates. While GnRH antagonists offer an advantage in terms of pain reduction for endometriosis, the more recent literature suggests using GnRH antagonists with ABT, which, while mitigating the hypo-oestrogenic effects of GnRH antagonists, maintain their efficacy, while allowing their long-term use.
Keywords
Humans, Endometriosis/drug therapy, Endometriosis/complications, Female, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors, Pelvic Pain/drug therapy, Pelvic Pain/etiology, Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use, Estrogens/therapeutic use, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Add-back, Dysmenorrhoea, Endometriosis, Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists, Pelvic pain
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
09/08/2024 14:25
Last modification date
21/09/2024 6:21
Usage data