A European multicentre prospective randomized study to assess the use of assisted hatching with a diode laser and the benefit of an immunosuppressive/antibiotic treatment in different patient populations

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: REF.pdf (215.67 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_A4BBC0CBB357
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A European multicentre prospective randomized study to assess the use of assisted hatching with a diode laser and the benefit of an immunosuppressive/antibiotic treatment in different patient populations
Périodique
Human Reproduction (oxford, England)
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Primi M.P., Senn A., Montag M., Van der Ven H., Mandelbaum J., Veiga A., Barri P., Germond M.
ISSN
0268-1161 (Print)
ISSN-L
0268-1161
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2004
Volume
19
Numéro
10
Pages
2325-2333
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Assisted hatching (AH) techniques, designed for facilitating the embryo escape out of the zona pellucida (ZP) have been used in IVF centres since 1992. The initial indications for AH were patient's age, ZP thickness, high basal FSH and repeated IVF failures. Several retrospective and prospective studies assessing AH in these indications have given disparate results. Our aims were to evaluate the benefits of AH and immunosuppressive/antibiotic treatment (IA) in patients with either a poor prognosis of success, previous implantation failures or transfers of cryopreserved embryos.
METHODS: Four IVF centres allocated 426 patients, randomized for AH and IA, into four groups of AH indications between 1997 and 1999. AH was performed with a diode laser. ZP thickness, opening size and embryo score were recorded. Outcome measures were implantation and delivery rates.
RESULTS: Patients coming for a first or third transfer of cryopreserved embryos and poor prognosis patients admitted for a first trial did not benefit from AH. Even patients with repeated implantation failures of fresh embryos did not gain significantly from AH.
CONCLUSIONS: Among AH indications, absence of implantation after several transfers of good quality embryos remains the strongest patient selection criterion. Prescription of an immunosuppressive/antibiotic treatment is essential.
Mots-clé
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use, Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use, Zona Pellucida/radiation effects
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
13/07/2018 10:00
Dernière modification de la notice
14/02/2022 8:56
Données d'usage