A priori quality assurance using a benchmark case of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 in oligometastatic head and neck cancer patients.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_770454ACEC36
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A priori quality assurance using a benchmark case of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 in oligometastatic head and neck cancer patients.
Périodique
Cancer radiotherapie
ISSN
1769-6658 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1278-3218
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
25
Numéro
8
Pages
755-762
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
A Benchmark Case (BC) was performed as part of the quality assurance process of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 OMET study, testing the possibility of multisite stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) alone in oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) as an alternative to systemic treatment and SBRT.
Compliance of the investigating centers with the prescription, delineation, planning and evaluation recommendations available in the research protocol was assessed. In addition, classical dosimetric analysis was supplemented by quantitative geometric analysis using conformation indices.
Twenty centers participated in the BC analysis. Among them, four major deviations (MaD) were reported in two centers. Two (10%) centers in MaD had omitted the satellite tumor nodule and secondarily validated after revision. Their respective DICE indexes were 0.37 and 0 and use of extracranial SBRT devices suboptimal There were significant residual heterogeneities between participating centers, including those with a similar SBRT equipment, with impact of plan quality using standard indicators and geometric indices.
A priori QA using a BC conditioning the participation of the clinical investigation centers showed deviations from good SBRT practice and led to the exclusion of one out of the twenty participating centers. The majority of centers have demonstrated rigorous compliance with the research protocol. The use of quality indexes adds a complementary approach to improve assessment of plan quality.
Compliance of the investigating centers with the prescription, delineation, planning and evaluation recommendations available in the research protocol was assessed. In addition, classical dosimetric analysis was supplemented by quantitative geometric analysis using conformation indices.
Twenty centers participated in the BC analysis. Among them, four major deviations (MaD) were reported in two centers. Two (10%) centers in MaD had omitted the satellite tumor nodule and secondarily validated after revision. Their respective DICE indexes were 0.37 and 0 and use of extracranial SBRT devices suboptimal There were significant residual heterogeneities between participating centers, including those with a similar SBRT equipment, with impact of plan quality using standard indicators and geometric indices.
A priori QA using a BC conditioning the participation of the clinical investigation centers showed deviations from good SBRT practice and led to the exclusion of one out of the twenty participating centers. The majority of centers have demonstrated rigorous compliance with the research protocol. The use of quality indexes adds a complementary approach to improve assessment of plan quality.
Mots-clé
Benchmarking, France, Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology, Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis/radiotherapy, Organs at Risk, Pharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology, Pharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Radiometry, Radiosurgery/instrumentation, Radiosurgery/methods, Radiosurgery/standards, Radiotherapy Dosage, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/secondary, Assurance qualité, Benchmark case, Cancer, Clinical trial, Deviation, Déviation, Essai clinique, Head and neck, ORL, Quality assurance, Radiothérapie stéréotaxique, Stereotactic radiotherapy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
04/10/2021 10:30
Dernière modification de la notice
25/09/2024 6:20