Voie centrale, PICC-line ou Midline : quel cathéter pour quel patient ? [Central venous catheter, PICC-line or Midline : which catheter for my patient?]
Détails
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_56950C89FD65
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Voie centrale, PICC-line ou Midline : quel cathéter pour quel patient ? [Central venous catheter, PICC-line or Midline : which catheter for my patient?]
Périodique
Revue medicale suisse
ISSN
1660-9379 (Print)
ISSN-L
1660-9379
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
26/01/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Numéro
766
Pages
121-125
Langue
français
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Midline long peripheral venous catheters are an interesting alternative to central venous catheters and PICC-lines when the placement of a peripheral venous catheter is impossible or when the patient requires prolonged intravenous treatment. Midline catheters can be inserted at the patient's bedside and require no radiological verification after insertion. They can be kept in place for up to 14 days and allow for repeated blood sampling. The mechanical, infectious, or thrombotic complications and safety profile do not differ from other venous catheters, notably PICC-line.
Mots-clé
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects, Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects, Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects, Humans, Thrombosis
Pubmed
Création de la notice
08/02/2022 10:09
Dernière modification de la notice
10/09/2023 6:56