Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_4A9080FE6859
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.
Périodique
British Journal of Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Mortensen K., Nilsson M., Slim K., Schäfer M., Mariette C., Braga M., Carli F., Demartines N., Griffin S.M., Lassen K.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Group, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ERAS Group
Contributeur⸱rice⸱s
Dejong CH., Fearon KC., Ljungqvist O., Lobo DN., Revhaug A.
ISSN
1365-2168 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0007-1323
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
101
Numéro
10
Pages
1209-1229
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublishDocument Type: Review
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Application of evidence-based perioperative care protocols reduces complication rates, accelerates recovery and shortens hospital stay. Presently, there are no comprehensive guidelines for perioperative care for gastrectomy.
METHODS: An international working group within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society assembled an evidence-based comprehensive framework for optimal perioperative care for patients undergoing gastrectomy. Data were retrieved from standard databases and personal archives. Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system and were discussed until consensus was reached within the group. The quality of evidence was rated 'high', 'moderate', 'low' or 'very low'. Recommendations were graded as 'strong' or 'weak'.
RESULTS: The available evidence has been summarized and recommendations are given for 25 items, eight of which contain procedure-specific evidence. The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations.
CONCLUSION: The present evidence-based framework provides comprehensive advice on optimal perioperative care for the patient undergoing gastrectomy and facilitates multi-institutional prospective cohort registries and adequately powered randomized trials for further research.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/09/2014 17:46
Dernière modification de la notice
07/06/2023 6:57
Données d'usage