Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_4A9080FE6859
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.
Journal
British Journal of Surgery
Author(s)
Mortensen K., Nilsson M., Slim K., Schäfer M., Mariette C., Braga M., Carli F., Demartines N., Griffin S.M., Lassen K.
Working group(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Group, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ERAS Group
Contributor(s)
Dejong CH., Fearon KC., Ljungqvist O., Lobo DN., Revhaug A.
ISSN
1365-2168 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0007-1323
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Volume
101
Number
10
Pages
1209-1229
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublishDocument Type: Review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Application of evidence-based perioperative care protocols reduces complication rates, accelerates recovery and shortens hospital stay. Presently, there are no comprehensive guidelines for perioperative care for gastrectomy.
METHODS: An international working group within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society assembled an evidence-based comprehensive framework for optimal perioperative care for patients undergoing gastrectomy. Data were retrieved from standard databases and personal archives. Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system and were discussed until consensus was reached within the group. The quality of evidence was rated 'high', 'moderate', 'low' or 'very low'. Recommendations were graded as 'strong' or 'weak'.
RESULTS: The available evidence has been summarized and recommendations are given for 25 items, eight of which contain procedure-specific evidence. The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations.
CONCLUSION: The present evidence-based framework provides comprehensive advice on optimal perioperative care for the patient undergoing gastrectomy and facilitates multi-institutional prospective cohort registries and adequately powered randomized trials for further research.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
19/09/2014 16:46
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:58
Usage data