Cellularity, characteristics of hematopoietic parameters and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_433CD5C9496F
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Cellularity, characteristics of hematopoietic parameters and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Périodique
European Journal of Haematology
ISSN
1600-0609 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0902-4441
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
95
Numéro
3
Pages
181-189
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; ReviewPublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) present with a normo- or hyperplastic bone marrow in most cases. We aimed at a characterization of patients with different types of cellularity.
METHODS: We assessed marrow cellularity both by histology and cytology in 1270 patients and analyzed hematologic, cytogenetic, and prognostic parameters accordingly.
RESULTS: The concordance of the assessment of cellularity differed dramatically between histology and cytology as only 36.5% were described as hypocellular by both methods (P < 0.0005) (hypocellular 16.4%, normocellular 23.3%, hypercellular 60.3%). There were no major differences with regard to hematopoietic insufficiency. The presence of fibrosis was associated to hypercellular bone marrow. Median survival differed from 38 months in hypocellular, 42 months in normocellular, and 25 months in hypercellular MDS (P < 0.0005). AML progression rates were 33% for hypercellular MDS after 2 yr, whereas hypo- and normocellular had a progression rate of 19% after 2 yr (P = 0.018). IPSS and IPSS-R were able to identify different risk groups within all three cellularity groups.
CONCLUSION: Based on our data, hypocellular patients obviously do not present as a separate entity, as there were no striking differences with regard to cytogenetics and WHO types. Assessment of cellularity should be performed by histopathology.
METHODS: We assessed marrow cellularity both by histology and cytology in 1270 patients and analyzed hematologic, cytogenetic, and prognostic parameters accordingly.
RESULTS: The concordance of the assessment of cellularity differed dramatically between histology and cytology as only 36.5% were described as hypocellular by both methods (P < 0.0005) (hypocellular 16.4%, normocellular 23.3%, hypercellular 60.3%). There were no major differences with regard to hematopoietic insufficiency. The presence of fibrosis was associated to hypercellular bone marrow. Median survival differed from 38 months in hypocellular, 42 months in normocellular, and 25 months in hypercellular MDS (P < 0.0005). AML progression rates were 33% for hypercellular MDS after 2 yr, whereas hypo- and normocellular had a progression rate of 19% after 2 yr (P = 0.018). IPSS and IPSS-R were able to identify different risk groups within all three cellularity groups.
CONCLUSION: Based on our data, hypocellular patients obviously do not present as a separate entity, as there were no striking differences with regard to cytogenetics and WHO types. Assessment of cellularity should be performed by histopathology.
Mots-clé
Bone Marrow/pathology, Disease Progression, Female, Hematologic Tests, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/etiology, Male, Myelodysplastic Syndromes/blood, Myelodysplastic Syndromes/diagnosis, Myelodysplastic Syndromes/</QualifierName> <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000473">, Prognosis
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
29/05/2016 14:52
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:47