Cellularity, characteristics of hematopoietic parameters and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_433CD5C9496F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Cellularity, characteristics of hematopoietic parameters and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Journal
European Journal of Haematology
ISSN
1600-0609 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0902-4441
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
95
Number
3
Pages
181-189
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; ReviewPublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) present with a normo- or hyperplastic bone marrow in most cases. We aimed at a characterization of patients with different types of cellularity.
METHODS: We assessed marrow cellularity both by histology and cytology in 1270 patients and analyzed hematologic, cytogenetic, and prognostic parameters accordingly.
RESULTS: The concordance of the assessment of cellularity differed dramatically between histology and cytology as only 36.5% were described as hypocellular by both methods (P < 0.0005) (hypocellular 16.4%, normocellular 23.3%, hypercellular 60.3%). There were no major differences with regard to hematopoietic insufficiency. The presence of fibrosis was associated to hypercellular bone marrow. Median survival differed from 38 months in hypocellular, 42 months in normocellular, and 25 months in hypercellular MDS (P < 0.0005). AML progression rates were 33% for hypercellular MDS after 2 yr, whereas hypo- and normocellular had a progression rate of 19% after 2 yr (P = 0.018). IPSS and IPSS-R were able to identify different risk groups within all three cellularity groups.
CONCLUSION: Based on our data, hypocellular patients obviously do not present as a separate entity, as there were no striking differences with regard to cytogenetics and WHO types. Assessment of cellularity should be performed by histopathology.
METHODS: We assessed marrow cellularity both by histology and cytology in 1270 patients and analyzed hematologic, cytogenetic, and prognostic parameters accordingly.
RESULTS: The concordance of the assessment of cellularity differed dramatically between histology and cytology as only 36.5% were described as hypocellular by both methods (P < 0.0005) (hypocellular 16.4%, normocellular 23.3%, hypercellular 60.3%). There were no major differences with regard to hematopoietic insufficiency. The presence of fibrosis was associated to hypercellular bone marrow. Median survival differed from 38 months in hypocellular, 42 months in normocellular, and 25 months in hypercellular MDS (P < 0.0005). AML progression rates were 33% for hypercellular MDS after 2 yr, whereas hypo- and normocellular had a progression rate of 19% after 2 yr (P = 0.018). IPSS and IPSS-R were able to identify different risk groups within all three cellularity groups.
CONCLUSION: Based on our data, hypocellular patients obviously do not present as a separate entity, as there were no striking differences with regard to cytogenetics and WHO types. Assessment of cellularity should be performed by histopathology.
Keywords
Bone Marrow/pathology, Disease Progression, Female, Hematologic Tests, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/etiology, Male, Myelodysplastic Syndromes/blood, Myelodysplastic Syndromes/diagnosis, Myelodysplastic Syndromes/</QualifierName> <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000473">, Prognosis
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
29/05/2016 14:52
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:47