Neurocognitive components of gambling disorder: Implications for policy, prevention , and treatment

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: Tous droits réservés
ID Serval
serval:BIB_381D2286EEFE
Type
Partie de livre
Sous-type
Chapitre: chapitre ou section
Collection
Publications
Titre
Neurocognitive components of gambling disorder: Implications for policy, prevention , and treatment
Titre du livre
Harm Reduction for Problem Gambling: A Public Health Approach
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Navas Juan F., Billieux Joël, Verdejo-García Antonio, Perales José C.
Editeur
Routledge
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/2019
Langue
anglais
Résumé
The present chapter aims to describe the psychobiological bases of gambling disorder (GD), and to identify how neuroscience research could inform better prevention and treatment strategies. In the first section, we describe the characteristics shared by patients with gambling disorder (PGD), and revisit the literature showing that GD is in essence a disorder of learning. Among vulnerabilities, we highlight factors incrementing the allure of gambling, making it more rewarding, or strengthening its negatively reinforcing properties.
Second, we pinpoint the variables contributing to individual differences within the PGD population, with a particular focus on emotion regulation. Dysregulation of automatic (modelfree) emotion regulation is suggested to be a complicating factor of GD, and a transdiagnostic vulnerability factor for psychopathology beyond GD. Dysregulation of controlled (model-based) emotion regulation strategies, along with gambling-related cognitive distortions, are hypothesised to contribute to self-deceptive thinking in some gamblers. Lastly, all these variables are integrated into a dimensional model (the Gambling Space Model), aimed at updating previous cluster-based proposals to subtype PGD, by incorporating recent neurocognitive evidence. The implications of the model are discussed, and we address its implications on policy and regulation. Additionally, we discuss whether or not other putative behavioural addictions should be ascribed the same consideration. Eventually, we analyse how better understanding individual differences could contribute to better treatment and prevention designs.
Mots-clé
Gambling Disorder, Neurosciences, Decision making
Création de la notice
10/01/2020 10:30
Dernière modification de la notice
27/01/2020 17:32
Données d'usage