Neurocognitive components of gambling disorder: Implications for policy, prevention , and treatment

Details

Ressource 1Request a copy Sous embargo indéterminé.
State: Public
Version: author
License: All rights reserved
Serval ID
serval:BIB_381D2286EEFE
Type
A part of a book
Publication sub-type
Chapter: chapter ou part
Collection
Publications
Title
Neurocognitive components of gambling disorder: Implications for policy, prevention , and treatment
Title of the book
Harm Reduction for Problem Gambling: A Public Health Approach
Author(s)
Navas Juan F., Billieux Joël, Verdejo-García Antonio, Perales José C.
Publisher
Routledge
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2019
Language
english
Abstract
The present chapter aims to describe the psychobiological bases of gambling disorder (GD), and to identify how neuroscience research could inform better prevention and treatment strategies. In the first section, we describe the characteristics shared by patients with gambling disorder (PGD), and revisit the literature showing that GD is in essence a disorder of learning. Among vulnerabilities, we highlight factors incrementing the allure of gambling, making it more rewarding, or strengthening its negatively reinforcing properties.
Second, we pinpoint the variables contributing to individual differences within the PGD population, with a particular focus on emotion regulation. Dysregulation of automatic (modelfree) emotion regulation is suggested to be a complicating factor of GD, and a transdiagnostic vulnerability factor for psychopathology beyond GD. Dysregulation of controlled (model-based) emotion regulation strategies, along with gambling-related cognitive distortions, are hypothesised to contribute to self-deceptive thinking in some gamblers. Lastly, all these variables are integrated into a dimensional model (the Gambling Space Model), aimed at updating previous cluster-based proposals to subtype PGD, by incorporating recent neurocognitive evidence. The implications of the model are discussed, and we address its implications on policy and regulation. Additionally, we discuss whether or not other putative behavioural addictions should be ascribed the same consideration. Eventually, we analyse how better understanding individual differences could contribute to better treatment and prevention designs.
Keywords
Gambling Disorder, Neurosciences, Decision making
Create date
10/01/2020 9:30
Last modification date
27/01/2020 16:32
Usage data