Comparative analysis of ten assesment grids of quality criteria in qualitative research
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_2CFEDFA9217B
Type
Actes de conférence (partie): contribution originale à la littérature scientifique, publiée à l'occasion de conférences scientifiques, dans un ouvrage de compte-rendu (proceedings), ou dans l'édition spéciale d'un journal reconnu (conference proceedings).
Sous-type
Abstract (résumé de présentation): article court qui reprend les éléments essentiels présentés à l'occasion d'une conférence scientifique dans un poster ou lors d'une intervention orale.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparative analysis of ten assesment grids of quality criteria in qualitative research
Titre de la conférence
25th European Health Psychology Conference "Engaging with Other Health Professions: Challenges and Perspectives"
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Langue
anglais
Résumé
The authors present 10 grids which are widely used in Health Sciences for the assessment of
quality in research. They proceed through a comparative thematic analysis of these grids and
show which points of view are preferred. They insist on the issues that differentiate these
grids from each other and suggest the analysis of their differences by distinguishing the
theoretical perspectives that underpin each one of these grids. Whilst the authors of the
assessment grids rarely refer to the implicit theoretical backgrounds that guide their work,
findings show that these grids convey varied epistemologies and research models. This gap
renders the comparison of quality assessment in qualitative research a very difficult task,
unless we shift our focus on the relationship between the grids, their theoretical backgrounds
and their specific research subjects.
quality in research. They proceed through a comparative thematic analysis of these grids and
show which points of view are preferred. They insist on the issues that differentiate these
grids from each other and suggest the analysis of their differences by distinguishing the
theoretical perspectives that underpin each one of these grids. Whilst the authors of the
assessment grids rarely refer to the implicit theoretical backgrounds that guide their work,
findings show that these grids convey varied epistemologies and research models. This gap
renders the comparison of quality assessment in qualitative research a very difficult task,
unless we shift our focus on the relationship between the grids, their theoretical backgrounds
and their specific research subjects.
Création de la notice
06/10/2011 8:57
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:12
Données d'usage
