Comparative analysis of ten assesment grids of quality criteria in qualitative research
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_2CFEDFA9217B
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Publication sub-type
Abstract (Abstract): shot summary in a article that contain essentials elements presented during a scientific conference, lecture or from a poster.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparative analysis of ten assesment grids of quality criteria in qualitative research
Title of the conference
25th European Health Psychology Conference "Engaging with Other Health Professions: Challenges and Perspectives"
Publication state
Published
Issued date
09/2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Abstract
The authors present 10 grids which are widely used in Health Sciences for the assessment of
quality in research. They proceed through a comparative thematic analysis of these grids and
show which points of view are preferred. They insist on the issues that differentiate these
grids from each other and suggest the analysis of their differences by distinguishing the
theoretical perspectives that underpin each one of these grids. Whilst the authors of the
assessment grids rarely refer to the implicit theoretical backgrounds that guide their work,
findings show that these grids convey varied epistemologies and research models. This gap
renders the comparison of quality assessment in qualitative research a very difficult task,
unless we shift our focus on the relationship between the grids, their theoretical backgrounds
and their specific research subjects.
quality in research. They proceed through a comparative thematic analysis of these grids and
show which points of view are preferred. They insist on the issues that differentiate these
grids from each other and suggest the analysis of their differences by distinguishing the
theoretical perspectives that underpin each one of these grids. Whilst the authors of the
assessment grids rarely refer to the implicit theoretical backgrounds that guide their work,
findings show that these grids convey varied epistemologies and research models. This gap
renders the comparison of quality assessment in qualitative research a very difficult task,
unless we shift our focus on the relationship between the grids, their theoretical backgrounds
and their specific research subjects.
Create date
06/10/2011 8:57
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:12
Usage data
