Whence Brand Evaluations? Investigating The Relevance of Personal and Extrapersonal Associations in Brand Attitudes

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_012EE1E2259A
Type
Actes de conférence (partie): contribution originale à la littérature scientifique, publiée à l'occasion de conférences scientifiques, dans un ouvrage de compte-rendu (proceedings), ou dans l'édition spéciale d'un journal reconnu (conference proceedings).
Sous-type
Abstract (résumé de présentation): article court qui reprend les éléments essentiels présentés à l'occasion d'une conférence scientifique dans un poster ou lors d'une intervention orale.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Whence Brand Evaluations? Investigating The Relevance of Personal and Extrapersonal Associations in Brand Attitudes
Titre de la conférence
NA-Advances in Consumer Research
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Czellar S., Voyer B., Schwob A., Luna D.
Editeur
Association for Consumer Research
Adresse
Duluth, MN
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2009
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Editeur⸱rice scientifique
McGill A. L. , Shavitt S.
Volume
36
Pages
681-682
Langue
anglais
Résumé
A recent conceptualization of the structure of attitudes proposes that people may hold associations that contribute to their personal attitudes about an object (personal associations) but also highly salient associations that do not contribute to their attitudes toward the object (extrapersonal associations; Olson and Fazio 2004). We conducted three studies with brands in the automobile industry to investigate the applicability of this new association typology to consumer attitude domains. Study 1 suggests the presence of extrapersonal associations for all brands investigated, by showing that some highly salient brand associations indeed contribute to brand attitudes but other similarly salient associations do not. Experimental data in Study 2 indicate that an individual difference, consumer expertise with the category, impacts the accessibility of personal associations in a brand evaluation context. Study 3 further strengthens the validity of the new typology by showing that it can meaningfully explain the different types of associations made accessible by persuasive messages. Taken together, our three studies provide strong support for Olson and Fazio's (2004) framework and highlight its value for a better understanding of the nature of the brand associations that shape consumer brand attitudes.
Création de la notice
18/11/2010 15:25
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:23
Données d'usage