Interdit d'interdire ? Vers une meilleure compréhension de l'autonomie et des règles au sein des relations parents-adolescents.

Details

Ressource 1Download: Van Petegem et al. (postprint_Interdit_interdire_CAP).pdf (249.30 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_CE49255C69B0
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Interdit d'interdire ? Vers une meilleure compréhension de l'autonomie et des règles au sein des relations parents-adolescents.
Journal
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
Author(s)
Van Petegem S., Baudat S., Zimmermann G.
ISSN
1878-7304
0708-5591
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
60
Number
3
Pages
194-202
Language
french
Abstract
In developmental psychology, developing a sense of autonomy is claimed to be an important goal for adolescents. Nevertheless, the question of whether autonomy is always positive for adolescents is a highly debated issue. The goal of this review paper is to provide an overview of research distinguishing between two definitions of autonomy (autonomy as independence, and autonomy as self-endorsed functioning), and how this distinction helps understanding under which conditions autonomy is positive for adolescent development. Further, this paper discusses how this distinction also helps clarifying under which conditions parental rule-setting is effective or not. That is, we argue that it is important to consider the parents’ communication style (i.e., autonomy-supportive or controlling), for understanding whether adolescents will be more likely to accept or reject parental rules.
Keywords
adolescence, auto-détermination, autonomie, contrôle, parents
Web of science
Create date
19/10/2018 18:20
Last modification date
27/03/2020 7:19
Usage data