Variational Bayesian inference with complex geostatistical priors using inverse autoregressive flows
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_BB2F0E925B0B
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Variational Bayesian inference with complex geostatistical priors using inverse autoregressive flows
Journal
Computers & Geosciences
ISSN
0098-3004
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
171
Pages
105263
Language
english
Abstract
We combine inverse autoregressive flows (IAF) and variational Bayesian inference (variational Bayes) in the context of geophysical inversion parameterized with deep generative models encoding complex priors. Variational Bayes approximates the unnormalized posterior distribution parametrically within a given family of distributions by solving an optimization problem. Although prone to bias if the chosen family of distributions is too limited, it provides a computationally-efficient approach that scales well to high-dimensional inverse problems. To enhance the expressiveness of the variational distribution, we explore its combination with IAFs that allow samples from a simple base distribution to be pushed forward through a series of invertible transformations onto an approximate posterior. The IAF is learned by maximizing the lower bound of the evidence (marginal likelihood), which is equivalent to minimizing the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the approximation and the target posterior distribution. In our examples, we use either a deep generative adversarial network (GAN) or a variational autoencoder (VAE) to parameterize complex geostatistical priors. Although previous attempts to perform Gauss–Newton inversion in combination with GANs of the same architecture were proven unsuccessful, the trained IAF provides a good reconstruction of channelized subsurface models for both GAN- and VAE-based inversions using synthetic crosshole ground-penetrating-radar data. For the considered examples, the computational cost of our approach is seven times lower than for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inversion. Furthermore, the VAE-based approximations in the latent space are in good agreement. The VAE-based inversion requires only one sample to estimate gradients with respect to the IAF parameters at each iteration, while the GAN-based inversions need more samples and the corresponding posterior approximation is less accurate.
Keywords
Geophysical inversion, Normalizing flows, Variational inference, Generative adversarial network, Variational autoencoder
Publisher's website
Create date
30/06/2023 11:24
Last modification date
01/06/2024 6:18