A multicentric evaluation of IDMS-traceable creatinine enzymatic assays
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A5BA45ABA839
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A multicentric evaluation of IDMS-traceable creatinine enzymatic assays
Journal
Clin Chim Acta
ISSN
1873-3492 (Electronic))
ISSN-L
0009-8981
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Volume
412
Number
23-24
Pages
2070-5
Language
english
Notes
Pieroni, Laurence
Delanaye, Pierre
Boutten, Anne
Bargnoux, Anne-Sophie
Rozet, Eric
Delatour, Vincent
Carlier, Marie-Christine
Hanser, Anne-Marie
Cavalier, Etienne
Froissart, Marc
Cristol, Jean-Paul
eng
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Netherlands
2011/08/02 06:00
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Nov 20;412(23-24):2070-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
Delanaye, Pierre
Boutten, Anne
Bargnoux, Anne-Sophie
Rozet, Eric
Delatour, Vincent
Carlier, Marie-Christine
Hanser, Anne-Marie
Cavalier, Etienne
Froissart, Marc
Cristol, Jean-Paul
eng
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Netherlands
2011/08/02 06:00
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Nov 20;412(23-24):2070-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease definition is based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimations which are derived from creatinine-based equations. The accuracy of GFR estimation is thus largely dependent of those of serum creatinine assays. International recommendations highlight the need for traceable creatinine assays. The French Society of Clinical Biochemistry conducted a study for measuring accuracy of creatinine enzymatic methods. This evaluation involved 25 clinical laboratories. Creatinine was measured in serum pools ranging from 35.9+/-0.9 mumol/L to 174.5+/-3.1 mumol/L (IDMS determination) using 12 creatinine enzymatic methods. For all creatinine values greater than 74.4+/-1.4 mumol/L, the bias and imprecision did not exceed 5% and 5.9%, respectively. For the lowest value (35.9+/-0.9 mumol/L), the bias ranged from -1.8 to 9.9% (with one exception). At this level, the imprecision ranged from 1.9 to 7.8%. The true performances of the assays (couples of bias and relative standard deviation), were evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulations. Most of the assays fall within the maximum Total Error of 12% at all concentrations. This study demonstrates substantial improvements in the calibration, traceability and precision of the enzymatic methods, reaching the NKDEP recommendations. Moreover, most of these assays allowed accurate creatinine measurements for creatinine levels lower than 40 mumol/L.
Keywords
Calibration, Creatinine/*blood, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Reproducibility of Results
Pubmed
Publisher's website
Create date
03/03/2016 16:49
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:10