Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFRCT Planner.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_91392D7711AB
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFRCT Planner.
Journal
European radiology
ISSN
1432-1084 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0938-7994
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Number
4
Pages
2677-2688
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Multicenter Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To assess the accuracy of a virtual stenting tool based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from CCTA (FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner) across different levels of image quality.
Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80. All patients underwent CCTA performed with recent-generation scanners. CCTA image quality was adjudicated using the four-point Likert scale at a per-vessel level by an independent committee blinded to the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner. Patient- and technical-related factors that could affect the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner accuracy were evaluated. The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was applied mirroring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to determine the agreement with invasively measured post-PCI FFR.
Overall, 120 patients (123 vessels) were included. Invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.88 ± 0.06 and Planner FFR <sub>CT</sub> was 0.86 ± 0.06 (mean difference 0.02 FFR units, the lower limit of agreement (LLA) - 0.12, upper limit of agreement (ULA) 0.15). CCTA image quality was assessed as excellent (Likert score 4) in 48.3%, good (Likert score 3) in 45%, and sufficient (Likert score 2) in 6.7% of patients. The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was accurate across different levels of image quality with a mean difference between FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner and invasive post-PCI FFR of 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 4, 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 3 and 0.03 ± 0.08 in Likert score 2, p = 0.695. Nitrate dose ≥ 0.8mg was the only independent factor associated with the accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner (95%CI - 0.06 to - 0.001, p = 0.040).
The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR independent of CCTA image quality.
Being accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR across a wide spectrum of CT image quality, the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment. Adequate vasodilation during CT acquisition is relevant to improve the accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner.
• The fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography (FFR <sub>CT</sub> ) Planner is a novel tool able to accurately predict fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention. • The accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was confirmed across a wide spectrum of CT image quality. Nitrates dose at CT acquisition was the only independent predictor of its accuracy. • The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment.
Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80. All patients underwent CCTA performed with recent-generation scanners. CCTA image quality was adjudicated using the four-point Likert scale at a per-vessel level by an independent committee blinded to the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner. Patient- and technical-related factors that could affect the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner accuracy were evaluated. The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was applied mirroring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to determine the agreement with invasively measured post-PCI FFR.
Overall, 120 patients (123 vessels) were included. Invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.88 ± 0.06 and Planner FFR <sub>CT</sub> was 0.86 ± 0.06 (mean difference 0.02 FFR units, the lower limit of agreement (LLA) - 0.12, upper limit of agreement (ULA) 0.15). CCTA image quality was assessed as excellent (Likert score 4) in 48.3%, good (Likert score 3) in 45%, and sufficient (Likert score 2) in 6.7% of patients. The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was accurate across different levels of image quality with a mean difference between FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner and invasive post-PCI FFR of 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 4, 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 3 and 0.03 ± 0.08 in Likert score 2, p = 0.695. Nitrate dose ≥ 0.8mg was the only independent factor associated with the accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner (95%CI - 0.06 to - 0.001, p = 0.040).
The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR independent of CCTA image quality.
Being accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR across a wide spectrum of CT image quality, the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment. Adequate vasodilation during CT acquisition is relevant to improve the accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner.
• The fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography (FFR <sub>CT</sub> ) Planner is a novel tool able to accurately predict fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention. • The accuracy of the FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner was confirmed across a wide spectrum of CT image quality. Nitrates dose at CT acquisition was the only independent predictor of its accuracy. • The FFR <sub>CT</sub> Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment.
Keywords
Humans, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Prospective Studies, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography/methods, Computed Tomography Angiography/methods, Coronary Stenosis/therapy, Predictive Value of Tests, Artifacts, Coronary CT angiography, FFRCT, Image quality, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Planner
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
09/10/2023 12:38
Last modification date
26/03/2024 7:10