Prospective comparison of 3 gamma-probes for sentinel lymph node detection in 200 breast cancer patients1

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_0C97DC05109B
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Prospective comparison of 3 gamma-probes for sentinel lymph node detection in 200 breast cancer patients1
Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Author(s)
Classe  J. M., Fiche  M., Rousseau  C., Sagan  C., Dravet  F., Pioud  R., Lisbona  A., Ferrer  L., Campion  L., Resche  I., Curtet  C.
ISSN
0161-5505 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2005
Volume
46
Number
3
Pages
395-399
Notes
PT - Clinical Trial PT - Comparative Study PT - Controlled Clinical Trial PT - Journal Article PT - Validation Studies
Abstract
Previous reports have shown that axillary sentinel lymph node (ASLN) radiodetection allows accurate axillary staging for patients with early breast cancer. Radioguided surgery implies the use of a gamma-probe to count the emitted radioactivity of marked ASLNs. Several gamma-probes are commercially available, each with its own properties. The clinical impact of the type of gamma-probe used for ASLN radiodetection remains to be evaluated. METHODS: Three commercially available gamma-probes were evaluated: a scintillator with a bismuth germanate crystal (probe A), a semiconductor with a cadmium telluride crystal (probe B), and a semiconductor with a cadmium zinc telluride crystal (probe C). Two hundred patients with early breast cancer were prospectively enrolled to undergo ASLN radiodetection and axillary lymphadenectomy. ASLN mapping consisted of injecting (99m)Tc-sulfur-colloid around the tumor. For each patient, sentinel lymph nodes were counted successively with the 3 probes and the sensitivity of each gamma-probe was determined from ASLN residual activity. The results of detection rates and false-negative rates for each probe were compared. RESULTS: Mean residual ASLN activity was 52 kBq (range, 0.07-189 kBq). Sensitivity was compared among the 3 probes and found to be best for probe A. The detection rate of probe A was significantly better than that of probe B (93% vs. 86%, P = 0.05) but not different from that of probe C (93% vs. 90%). No differences in false-negative rates were observed among the 3 probes. CONCLUSION: ASLN detection rate depends on the type of gamma-probe used. Because failure to detect the ASLN leads to complete axillary lymphadenectomy, involving local morbidity and other sequelae, the type of gamma-probe must be considered important for sentinel lymph node radiodetection
Keywords
Breast/Breast Neoplasms/Equipment Design/Equipment Failure Analysis/Female/France/Gamma Cameras/Humans/instrumentation/Lymph Nodes/Lymphatic Metastasis/methods/Middle Aged/Pathology/radionuclide imaging/Reproducibility of Results/Sensitivity and Specificity/Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/surgery/Surgery,Computer-Assisted/Technology Assessment,Biomedical
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/01/2008 19:36
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:34
Usage data