Telementoring during endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_F889A52869EE
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Telementoring during endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective study.
Journal
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Author(s)
Di Valentino M., Alerci M., Bogen M., Tutta P., Sartori F., Marty B., von Segesser L., Gallino A.
ISSN
1526-6028
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2005
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Number
2
Pages
200-5
Language
english
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the use of telementoring for distant teaching and training in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: According to a prospectively designed study protocol, 48 patients underwent EVAR: the first 12 patients (group A) were treated at a secondary care center by an experienced interventionist, who was training the local team; a further 12 patients (group B) were operated by the local team at their secondary center with telementoring by the experienced operator from an adjacent suite; and the last 24 patients (group C) were operated by the local team with remote telementoring support from the experienced interventionist at a tertiary care center. Telementoring was performed using 3 video sources; images were transmitted using 4 ISDN lines. EVAR was performed using intravascular ultrasound and simultaneous fluoroscopy to obtain road mapping of the abdominal aorta and its branches, as well as for identifying the origins of the renal arteries, assessing the aortic neck, and monitoring the attachment of the stent-graft proximally and distally. RESULTS: Average duration of telementoring was 2.1 hours during the first 12 patients (group B) and 1.2 hours for the remaining 24 patients (group C). There was no difference in procedural duration (127+/-59 minutes in group A, 120+/-4 minutes in group B, and 119+/-39 minutes in group C; p=0.94) or the mean time spent in the ICU (26+/-15 hours in group A, 22+/-2 hours in group B, and 22+/-11 hours for group C; p=0.95). The length of hospital stay (11+/-4 days in group A, 9+/-4 days in group B, and 7+/-1 days in group C; p=0.002) was significantly different only for group C versus A (p=0.002). Only 1 (8.3%) patient (in group A: EVAR performed by the experienced operator) required conversion to open surgery because of iliac artery rupture. This was the only conversion (and the only death) in the entire study group (1/12 in group A versus 0/36 in groups B + C, p=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring for EVAR is feasible and shows promising results. It may serve as a model for development of similar projects for teaching other invasive procedures in cardiovascular medicine.
Keywords
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angioplasty, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Education, Distance, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mentors, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Videoconferencing
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
28/01/2008 10:31
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:24
Usage data