Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: serval:BIB_BE6E582704FE.P001 (569.97 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_BE6E582704FE
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators.
Périodique
International Journal For Quality In Health Care : Journal of the International Society For Quality In Health Care / Isqua
Auteur(s)
Carinci F., Van Gool K., Mainz J., Veillard J., Pichora E.C., Januel J.M., Arispe I., Kim S.M., Klazinga N.S.
Collaborateur(s)
OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Expert Group
Contributeur(s)
Haelterman M., Meeus P., Lacroix J., Cenek J., Barsøe CR., Grau K., Rooväli L., Hämaläinen P., Garcia V., Grenier C., Le Cossec B., Marbach M., Scheidt-Nave C., Mulholland D., Ekka-Zohar A., Kumakawa T., Okamoto E., Byeon EH., Kim KH., Park CS., Lepiksone J., Berthet F., Margue C., Van Den Berg M., Lindahl AK., Narbuvold H., Dudzik-Urbaniak E., Boto P., Lim EK., Mok WY., Pribakovic R., Gogorcena MA., Aggestam M., Köster M., Lawrence M., Langenegger M., Fehst K., Yilmaz S., Everard K., Raleigh V.
ISSN
1464-3677 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1353-4505
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Volume
27
Numéro
2
Pages
137-146
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To review and update the conceptual framework, indicator content and research priorities of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) project, after a decade of collaborative work.
DESIGN: A structured assessment was carried out using a modified Delphi approach, followed by a consensus meeting, to assess the suite of HCQI for international comparisons, agree on revisions to the original framework and set priorities for research and development.
SETTING: International group of countries participating to OECD projects.
PARTICIPANTS: Members of the OECD HCQI expert group.
RESULTS: A reference matrix, based on a revised performance framework, was used to map and assess all seventy HCQI routinely calculated by the OECD expert group. A total of 21 indicators were agreed to be excluded, due to the following concerns: (i) relevance, (ii) international comparability, particularly where heterogeneous coding practices might induce bias, (iii) feasibility, when the number of countries able to report was limited and the added value did not justify sustained effort and (iv) actionability, for indicators that were unlikely to improve on the basis of targeted policy interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The revised OECD framework for HCQI represents a new milestone of a long-standing international collaboration among a group of countries committed to building common ground for performance measurement. The expert group believes that the continuation of this work is paramount to provide decision makers with a validated toolbox to directly act on quality improvement strategies.
Mots-clé
Consensus, Delphi Technique, Humans, International Cooperation, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development/organization & administration, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development/standards, Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards, Quality of Health Care/standards
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
07/09/2015 15:12
Dernière modification de la notice
25/09/2019 6:10
Données d'usage