Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_9EB44C7AF95D
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index.
Journal
Radiology
ISSN
0033-8419 (Print)
ISSN-L
0033-8419
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2007
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
245
Number
2
Pages
458-466
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Evaluation Studies ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography with those of the routinely available aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) test for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients who have undergone liver biopsy for suspicion of chronic liver disease, with histopathologic examination as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee. All patients gave written informed consent. Eighty-eight patients (37 men, 51 women; mean age, 54.0 years +/- 13.1 [standard deviation]) who underwent liver biopsy for suspicion of chronic liver disease underwent MR elastography and APRI testing within 2 days after liver biopsy. At histopathologic examination, the fibrosis stage was assessed according to METAVIR scores (fibrosis scores F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]). MR elastography was performed by transmitting mechanical waves within the liver and measuring the small cyclic displacement of the liver spins with a phase-contrast spin-echo sequence. The performances of MR elastography and APRI testing were assessed, and the optimal cutoff values for fibrosis stage were determined with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: At MR elastography, areas under the ROC curves (A(z)) for elasticity and viscosity, respectively, were 0.999 and 0.863 at fibrosis scores greater than or equal to F2, 0.997 and 0.962 at scores greater than or equal to F3, and 1.000 and 0.986 at score F4. A(z) values for elasticity at MR were significantly larger than those for the APRI (0.854 at scores > or = F2, P < .001; 0.886 at scores > or = F3, P = .003; and 0.851 at score F4, P = .004). Optimal cutoff values of elasticity were 2.5 kPa for fibrosis scores greater than or equal to F2, 3.1 kPa for scores greater than or equal to F3, and 4.3 kPa for score F4.
CONCLUSION: Large A(z) values for elasticity (>0.990 for scores > or = F2, > or = F3, and F4) show that MR elastography was accurate in liver fibrosis staging and superior to biochemical testing with APRIs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee. All patients gave written informed consent. Eighty-eight patients (37 men, 51 women; mean age, 54.0 years +/- 13.1 [standard deviation]) who underwent liver biopsy for suspicion of chronic liver disease underwent MR elastography and APRI testing within 2 days after liver biopsy. At histopathologic examination, the fibrosis stage was assessed according to METAVIR scores (fibrosis scores F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]). MR elastography was performed by transmitting mechanical waves within the liver and measuring the small cyclic displacement of the liver spins with a phase-contrast spin-echo sequence. The performances of MR elastography and APRI testing were assessed, and the optimal cutoff values for fibrosis stage were determined with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: At MR elastography, areas under the ROC curves (A(z)) for elasticity and viscosity, respectively, were 0.999 and 0.863 at fibrosis scores greater than or equal to F2, 0.997 and 0.962 at scores greater than or equal to F3, and 1.000 and 0.986 at score F4. A(z) values for elasticity at MR were significantly larger than those for the APRI (0.854 at scores > or = F2, P < .001; 0.886 at scores > or = F3, P = .003; and 0.851 at score F4, P = .004). Optimal cutoff values of elasticity were 2.5 kPa for fibrosis scores greater than or equal to F2, 3.1 kPa for scores greater than or equal to F3, and 4.3 kPa for score F4.
CONCLUSION: Large A(z) values for elasticity (>0.990 for scores > or = F2, > or = F3, and F4) show that MR elastography was accurate in liver fibrosis staging and superior to biochemical testing with APRIs.
Keywords
Aspartate Aminotransferase, Cytoplasmic/blood, Biomarkers/blood, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods, Liver Cirrhosis/blood, Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Count, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
20/10/2016 17:08
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:04
Usage data
