Assessing medication adherence: options to consider.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_55E35811C0A7
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Assessing medication adherence: options to consider.
Journal
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Author(s)
Lehmann A., Aslani P., Ahmed R., Celio J., Gauchet A., Bedouch P., Bugnon O., Allenet B., Schneider M.P.
ISSN
2210-7711 (Electronic)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Volume
36
Number
1
Pages
55-69
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublishDocument Type: Review
Abstract
Background Adherence to chronic therapy is a key determinant of patient health outcomes in chronic disease. However, only about 50 % of patients adhere to chronic therapy. One of the challenges in promoting adherence is having an accurate understanding of adherence rates and the factors that contribute to non-adherence. There are many measures available to assess patient medication adherence. Aim of the review This review aims to present the commonly used indirect methods available for measuring medication adherence in routine healthcare and research studies. Method A literature review on medication adherence measures in patient populations with chronic conditions taking chronic medications was conducted through Medline (2003-2013). A complementary manual search of references cited in the retrieved studies was performed in order to identify any additional studies. Results Of the 238 initial Medline search results, 57 full texts were retrieved. Forty-seven articles were included as a result of the manual search. Adherence measures identified were: self-report (reported in 50 publications), electronic measures (33), pharmacy refills and claims data (26) and pill counts (25). Patient self-report, electronic measures, pharmacy refill and claims data were the most commonly used measures of adherence in research, routine practice, epidemiological and intervention studies. These methods, and their strengths and limitations have been described in this paper. Conclusion A multitude of indirect measures of adherence exist in the literature, however, there is no "gold" standard for measuring adherence to medications. Triangulation of methods increases the validity and reliability of the adherence data collected. To strengthen the adherence data collected and allow for comparison of data, future research and practice interventions should use an internationally accepted, operational standardized definition of medication adherence and clearly describe the medication adherence methods used.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
19/02/2014 19:16
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:10
Usage data