Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_50574799B32C
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice.
Périodique
Osteoporosis International
Auteur(s)
Kanis J.A., Hans D., Cooper C., Baim S., Bilezikian J.P., Binkley N., Cauley J.A., Compston J.E., Dawson-Hughes B., El-Hajj Fuleihan G., Johansson H., Leslie W.D., Lewiecki E.M., Luckey M., Oden A., Papapoulos S.E., Poiana C., Rizzoli R., Wahl D.A., McCloskey E.V.
Collaborateur(s)
Task Force of the FRAX Initiative
Contributeur(s)
Eugene M., Neil B., Jonathan A., Sanford B., Dennis B., Kleerekoper M., Krieg MA., Langdahl B., Laster A., Leib E., Masud T., McClung M., Rizzoli R., Saag K., Siris E., Lewiecki EM., Compston J., Adams JA., Adler R., Bauer D., Glen B., Patricia C., Adolfo DP., Didier H., Kanis JA., Krieg MA., Hans D., Leslie W., Moayyeri A., Josse R., Kendler D., Khan A., Lentle B., Lorenc R., Masri B., Miller P., Cauley J., Fuleihan Gel-H., Arabi A., Calderon A., Chen Z., Bee Chinoh S., Curtis J., Danielson M., Fujiwara S., Hanley D., Heikki K., Annie K., Lesnyak O., Looker A., Luckey M., Mellstrom D., Nieves J., Wojciech P., Rassi RE., Rizzoli R., Ragi-Eis S., Schott-Pethelaz AM., Silverman S.
ISSN
1433-2965 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0937-941X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Volume
22
Numéro
9
Pages
2395-2411
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The introduction of the WHO FRAX® algorithms has facilitated the assessment of fracture risk on the basis of fracture probability. Its use in fracture risk prediction has strengths, but also limitations of which the clinician should be aware and are the focus of this review
INTRODUCTION: The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) appointed a joint Task Force to develop resource documents in order to make recommendations on how to improve FRAX and better inform clinicians who use FRAX. The Task Force met in November 2010 for 3 days to discuss these topics which form the focus of this review.
METHODS: This study reviews the resource documents and joint position statements of ISCD and IOF.
RESULTS: Details on the clinical risk factors currently used in FRAX are provided, and the reasons for the exclusion of others are provided. Recommendations are made for the development of surrogate models where country-specific FRAX models are not available.
CONCLUSIONS: The wish list of clinicians for the modulation of FRAX is large, but in many instances, these wishes cannot presently be fulfilled; however, an explanation and understanding of the reasons may be helpful in translating the information provided by FRAX into clinical practice.
Mots-clé
Algorithms, Bone Density, Female, Fractures, Bone/epidemiology, Fractures, Bone/etiology, Humans, Male, Models, Statistical, Osteoporosis/complications, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment/methods, Risk Factors, World Health, World Health Organization
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
01/09/2011 13:13
Dernière modification de la notice
03/03/2018 17:08
Données d'usage