When solving 22-7 is much more difficult than 99-12.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_28B2D74BB26E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Case report (case report): feedback on an observation with a short commentary.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
When solving 22-7 is much more difficult than 99-12.
Journal
Neurocase
Author(s)
Carota A., Marangolo P., Markowitsch H.J., Calabrese P.
ISSN
1465-3656 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1355-4794
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2013
Volume
19
Number
1
Pages
54-66
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
We describe the case of a 69-year-old professor of mathematics (GV) who was examined 2 years after left-hemispheric capsular-thalamic haemorrhage. GV showed disproportionate impairment in subtractions requiring borrowing (22 - 7). For large subtraction problems without borrowing (99 - 12) performance was almost flawless. Subtractions with borrowing mostly relied on inadequate attempts to invert subtractions into the corresponding additions (22 - 7 = x as 7 + x = 22). The hypothesis is advanced that difficulty in the inhibitory components of attention tasks (Stroop test, go-no-go task) might be the responsible factor of his calculation impairment. A deficit in subtractions with borrowing might be related to left-hemispheric damage involving thalamo-cortical connections.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
21/02/2013 18:42
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:08
Usage data