Decoding auditory EEG responses in healthy and clinical populations: A comparative study.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_FFD3CAE33697
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Decoding auditory EEG responses in healthy and clinical populations: A comparative study.
Périodique
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Auteur⸱e⸱s
De Lucia M., Tzovara A.
ISSN
1872-678X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0165-0270
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
250
Pages
106-113
Langue
anglais
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Analyses of brain responses to external stimuli are typically based on the means computed across conditions. However in many cognitive and clinical applications, taking into account their variability across trials has turned out to be statistically more sensitive than comparing their means.
NEW METHOD: In this study we present a novel implementation of a single-trial topographic analysis (STTA) for discriminating auditory evoked potentials at predefined time-windows. This analysis has been previously introduced for extracting spatio-temporal features at the level of the whole neural response. Adapting the STTA on specific time windows is an essential step for comparing its performance to other time-window based algorithms.
RESULTS: We analyzed responses to standard vs. deviant sounds and showed that the new implementation of the STTA gives above-chance decoding results in all subjects (in comparison to 7 out of 11 with the original method). In comatose patients, the improvement of the decoding performance was even more pronounced than in healthy controls and doubled the number of significant results.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): We compared the results obtained with the new STTA to those based on a logistic regression in healthy controls and patients. We showed that the first of these two comparisons provided a better performance of the logistic regression; however only the new STTA provided significant results in comatose patients at group level.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide quantitative evidence that a systematic investigation of the accuracy of established methods in normal and clinical population is an essential step for optimizing decoding performance.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
15/02/2015 11:02
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:30
Données d'usage