Mirror therapy in children with hemiparesis: a randomized observer-blinded trial.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_FFCF6809E24B
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Mirror therapy in children with hemiparesis: a randomized observer-blinded trial.
Périodique
Developmental medicine and child neurology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bruchez R., Jequier Gygax M., Roches S., Fluss J., Jacquier D., Ballabeni P., Grunt S., Newman C.J.
ISSN
1469-8749 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0012-1622
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
58
Numéro
9
Pages
970-978
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To determine the efficacy of mirror therapy in children with hemiparesis.
The design was an observer-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number 48748291). Randomization was computer-generated, 1:1 allocation to mirror therapy or comparison groups. The settings were home-based intervention and tertiary centre assessments. Participants were 90 children with hemiparesis aged 7 to 17 years. Intervention was 15 minutes per day of simultaneous arm training, 5 days a week, for 5 weeks. The mirror therapy group used a mirror; those in the comparison group looked at their paretic limb. Assessments comprised measures of upper limb strength, function (Melbourne Assessment 2), daily performance (ABILHAND-Kids), and sensory function at weeks 0 (T0 ), 5 (T1 ), and 10 (T2 ).
There were no significant differences in outcomes and their progression over time between the mirror therapy and comparison groups. Post-hoc intention-to-treat analyses showed significant improvements in both groups for grasp strength (T0 -T1 +12.6%), pinch strength (T0 -T2 +9.1%), upper limb function in terms of accuracy (T0 -T2 +2.7%) and fluency (T0 -T2 +5.0%), as well as daily performance (T0 -T2 +16.6%). Per protocol analyses showed additional improvements in dexterity (T0 -T2 +4.0%).
The use of the mirror illusion during therapy had no significant effect on treatment outcomes. However, 5 weeks of daily simultaneous arm training significantly improved paretic upper limb strength, function, and daily use.

Mots-clé
Adolescent, Child, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy/methods, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Illusions/physiology, Intention, Male, Paresis/physiopathology, Paresis/psychology, Paresis/rehabilitation, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Upper Extremity/physiopathology
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
14/04/2016 16:27
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:30
Données d'usage