Armenian Morphosyntactic Alignment in Diachrony

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: meyer_14042021_v2_woTS.pdf (538.90 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Author's accepted manuscript
Licence: Tous droits réservés
ID Serval
serval:BIB_FD4DFE5CCBAA
Type
Partie de livre
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Armenian Morphosyntactic Alignment in Diachrony
Titre du livre
Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European family
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Meyer Robin
Editeur
Oxford University Press
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
23/08/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Editeur⸱rice scientifique
Dahl Eystein
Volume
50
Série
Oxford studies in diachronic and historical linguistics
Langue
anglais
Résumé
This chapter outlines the development of morphosyntactic alignment in Armenian from its pre-attested stage to modern forms of the language. For the most part, Armenian follows a nominative–accusative alignment pattern; the only exception occurs in the periphrastic perfect in Classical Armenian. This tense shows tripartite alignment: subjects are marked as nominative, agents as genitive, and objects as accusative. This alignment split prevails until the end of the Classical Armenian period. The origin of this alignment pattern lies in the contact with the West Middle Iranian language Parthian from which Armenian has borrowed heavily in several linguistic domains. The Armenian perfect and its alignment are the grammaticalised result of pattern replication, by which the Parthian ergative–absolutive past tense is borrowed into Armenian and there realised by means of the participle. The change from ergative–absolutive to tripartite alignment is based on morphosyntactic reanalysis of the object case.
Mots-clé
Morphosyntactic Alignment, Language contact, Pattern Replication, Parthian, Armenian, Historical syntax
Création de la notice
03/12/2020 1:25
Dernière modification de la notice
21/11/2022 9:15
Données d'usage