Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers' experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 34172545_BIB_FC96E7867530.pdf (776.34 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_FC96E7867530
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Qualitative evaluation of primary care providers' experiences caring for frequent users of the emergency department.
Périodique
BMJ open
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Brunner L., Canepa Allen M., Malebranche M., Hudon C., Senn N., Hugli O., Vu F., Akré C., Bodenmann P.
ISSN
2044-6055 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-6055
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
25/06/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
6
Pages
e044326
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Many interventions have been developed over the years to offer frequent users of the emergency department (FUEDs) better access to quality coordinated healthcare. Despite recognising the role primary care physicians (PCPs) play in FUEDs' care, to date their perceptions of case management, the most studied intervention, have rarely been assessed. Furthermore, a gap regarding PCPs' experience of caring for FUEDs persists. Thus, this study aimed to explore PCPs' perceptions of the care provided to FUEDs in emergency and primary care settings, their views on the local case management team (CMT), and their suggestions to improve FUEDs' care.
Qualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews and inductive thematic analysis.
Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.
Thirty PCPs participated, 16 in private practice (PP-PCPs) and 14 based at the Lausanne University Centre of General Medicine and Public Health (Unisanté-U-PCPs).
U-PCPs and PP-PCPs thought that most FUEDs' emergency department (ED) visits were legitimate, but questioned ED adequacy to meet FUEDs' needs. Yet, both PCP groups reported encountering many challenges in FUEDs' care themselves. In this context, PP-PCPs seemed more satisfied of the care they provided to FUEDs than U-PCPs. Generally, U-PCPs seemed to find more value in the CMT to help them care for FUEDs than PP-PCPs. To enhance FUEDs' care, U-PCPs and PP-PCPs suggested enhancing collaboration with other healthcare providers. U-PCPs also wished to increase their availability, and some PP-PCPs considered outpatient clinics, larger group practices or medical centres most appropriate to handle FUEDs' needs.
This study highlights the many challenges PCPs face in caring for FUEDs, that a CM intervention has the potential to mitigate, and provides ways forward in improving FUEDs' care, including reinforced communication with the CMT and ED physicians, and structural changes to their own way of delivering care to FUEDs.
Mots-clé
Attitude of Health Personnel, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Physicians, Primary Care, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research, Switzerland, general medicine (see internal medicine), primary care, qualitative research
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
05/07/2021 13:51
Dernière modification de la notice
12/01/2022 7:15
Données d'usage