MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_F75C062678B9
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies
Périodique
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Taffé Patrick, Peng Mingkai, Stagg Victoria, Williamson Tyler
ISSN
1477-0334 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0962-2802
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
08/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
28
Numéro
8
Pages
2557-2565
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Bland and Altman's limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative trait. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods are different, limits of agreement can be misleading. MethodCompare is an R package that implements a new statistical methodology, developed by Taffé in 2016. MethodCompare produces three new plots, the "bias plot", the "precision plot", and the "comparison plot" to visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method against the reference method. The method is illustrated on three simulated examples. Note that the Taffé method assumes that there are several measurements from reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.
Mots-clé
BLUP, Bland-Altman plot, MethodCompare, biasplot, differential bias, empirical Bayes, limits of agreement, measurement, method comparison, proportional bias
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
03/03/2018 14:13
Dernière modification de la notice
20/09/2019 6:09
Données d'usage