Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 19330888_Postprint.pdf (407.08 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F61F027558A7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.
Périodique
Medical Care
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Selby J.V., Uratsu C.S., Fireman B., Schmittdiel J.A., Peng T., Rodondi N., Karter A.J., Kerr E.A.
ISSN
1537-1948 ([electronic])
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2009
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
47
Numéro
4
Pages
395-402
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Validation Studies
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Intensification of pharmacotherapy in persons with poorly controlled chronic conditions has been proposed as a clinically meaningful process measure of quality. OBJECTIVE: To validate measures of treatment intensification by evaluating their associations with subsequent control in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus across 35 medical facility populations in Kaiser Permanente, Northern California. DESIGN: Hierarchical analyses of associations of improvements in facility-level treatment intensification rates from 2001 to 2003 with patient-level risk factor levels at the end of 2003. PATIENTS: Members (515,072 and 626,130; age >20 years) with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or diabetes mellitus in 2001 and 2003, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Treatment intensification for each risk factor defined as an increase in number of drug classes prescribed, of dosage for at least 1 drug, or switching to a drug from another class within 3 months of observed poor risk factor control. RESULTS: Facility-level improvements in treatment intensification rates between 2001 and 2003 were strongly associated with greater likelihood of being in control at the end of 2003 (P < or = 0.05 for each risk factor) after adjustment for patient- and facility-level covariates. Compared with facility rankings based solely on control, addition of percentages of poorly controlled patients who received treatment intensification changed 2003 rankings substantially: 14%, 51%, and 29% of the facilities changed ranks by 5 or more positions for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment intensification is tightly linked to improved control. Thus, it deserves consideration as a process measure for motivating quality improvement and possibly for measuring clinical performance.
Mots-clé
Aged, Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage, Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use, Antilipemic Agents/administration & dosage, Antilipemic Agents/therapeutic use, California, Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control, Chronic Disease/drug therapy, Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy, Drug Therapy/methods, Drug Therapy/standards, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy, Hypertension/drug therapy, Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage, Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use, Male, Managed Care Programs, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards, Risk Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
24/12/2009 11:55
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 17:22
Données d'usage