Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in hospitalised patients: are we overestimating renal function?

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_F571C2A5B3CF
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in hospitalised patients: are we overestimating renal function?
Périodique
Swiss Medical Weekly
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Frank M., Guarino-Gubler S., Burnier M., Maillard M., Keller F., Gabutti L.
ISSN
1424-3997 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0036-7672
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Volume
142
Pages
w13708
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
UNLABELLED: QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY AND PRINCIPLES: Estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hospitalised patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is important for drug prescription but it remains a difficult task. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of selected algorithms based on serum creatinine, cystatin C and beta-trace protein to estimate GFR and the potential added advantage of measuring muscle mass by bioimpedance.
METHODS: In a prospective unselected group of patients hospitalised in a general internal medicine ward with CKD, GFR was evaluated using inulin clearance as the gold standard and the algorithms of Cockcroft, MDRD, Larsson (cystatin C), White (beta-trace) and MacDonald (creatinine and muscle mass by bioimpedance).
RESULTS: 69 patients were included in the study. Median age (interquartile range) was 80 years (73-83); weight 74.7 kg (67.0-85.6), appendicular lean mass 19.1 kg (14.9-22.3), serum creatinine 126 μmol/l (100-149), cystatin C 1.45 mg/l (1.19-1.90), beta-trace protein 1.17 mg/l (0.99-1.53) and GFR measured by inulin 30.9 ml/min (22.0-43.3). The errors in the estimation of GFR and the area under the ROC curves (95% confidence interval) relative to inulin were respectively: Cockcroft 14.3 ml/min (5.55-23.2) and 0.68 (0.55-0.81), MDRD 16.3 ml/min (6.4-27.5) and 0.76 (0.64-0.87), Larsson 12.8 ml/min (4.50-25.3) and 0.82 (0.72-0.92), White 17.6 ml/min (11.5-31.5) and 0.75 (0.63-0.87), MacDonald 32.2 ml/min (13.9-45.4) and 0.65 (0.52-0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Currently used algorithms overestimate GFR in hospitalised patients with CKD. As a consequence eGFR targeted prescriptions of renal-cleared drugs, might expose patients to overdosing. The best results were obtained with the Larsson algorithm. The determination of muscle mass by bioimpedance did not provide significant contributions.
Mots-clé
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Creatinine/blood, Cystatin C/blood, Electric Impedance/diagnostic use, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Inpatients/statistics & numerical data, Intramolecular Oxidoreductases/blood, Lipocalins/blood, Muscle, Skeletal/anatomy & histology, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology, Reproducibility of Results, Switzerland
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
24/07/2013 9:32
Dernière modification de la notice
16/04/2020 5:26
Données d'usage