Comparison of subjective and objective evaluation of screen-film systems for chest radiography
Détails
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F4B7CB4C40B8
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of subjective and objective evaluation of screen-film systems for chest radiography
Périodique
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
ISSN
0144-8420
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
1998
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
80
Numéro
1-3
Pages
265-268
Langue
anglais
Notes
Article; Proceedings Paper Reference doses and quality in medical imaging:what the referring practitioner and directing medical staff should know : proceedings of a workshop, Luxembourg, October 23-25, 1997
Document Type: Article; Proceedings Paper
Document Type: Article; Proceedings Paper
Résumé
A subjective and an objective comparison of six screen-film systems is reported. Among the objective parameters
which characterise image quality, resolution appeared to be the most critical one when compared with the averaged ranking
produced by the radiologists. The results have shown that a relationship between dose and image quality can be established for
most of screen-film systems tested. The problem which remains in the optimisation procedure of chest imaging, is the definition
of the level of image quality requirements.
which characterise image quality, resolution appeared to be the most critical one when compared with the averaged ranking
produced by the radiologists. The results have shown that a relationship between dose and image quality can be established for
most of screen-film systems tested. The problem which remains in the optimisation procedure of chest imaging, is the definition
of the level of image quality requirements.
Web of science
Création de la notice
25/04/2008 17:11
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:21
Données d'usage
