Quality of the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation tool during nurse-physician calls in the ICU: An observational study.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F39C1D9A0E15
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Quality of the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation tool during nurse-physician calls in the ICU: An observational study.
Périodique
Nursing in critical care
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Scolari E., Soncini L., Ramelet A.S., Schneider A.G.
ISSN
1478-5153 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1362-1017
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
27
Numéro
6
Pages
796-803
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Observational Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) is a tool for structuring communication between healthcare professionals. SBAR reduces medical errors, however few studies have evaluated its quality in real practice.
To describe the quality of SBAR utilization by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses during phone conversations with physicians. To assess the influence of nurses' training, professional experience, and call circumstances on this quality.
This observational study was conducted in the adult ICU of a university hospital in French speaking Switzerland. All consecutive telephone calls from nurses to physicians during a calendar month, were recorded. Those related to a change in patients' clinical status were selected and analysed. The quality of SBAR utilization was assessed using a pre-defined analysis grid. Scores ranged from 0 (worst quality) to 100% (best quality). Nurses' sociodemographics and training record were collected. Multiple regression was used to assess determinants of SBAR quality including nurses characteristics and level of training.
We analysed 290 phone calls, made by 99 nurses. The median SBAR quality score was 41% (interquartile range [IQR] 33-48). Quality scores varied across the four items of SBAR: Situation 88% (81-94), Background 17% (6-27), Assessment 17% (0-33), and Recommendation 33% (17-40). Factors independently associated with higher SBAR quality were age (-0.66%, p = .002, 95% CI [-1.07; -0.25]), primary language other than French (-8.40%, p = .017, 95% CI [-15.29; -1.51]), lack of ICU expertise (-9.25%, p = .013, 95% CI [-16.5;1-1.99]), and SBAR training in pre-graduate nursing education (+11.53%, p = .028, 95% CI [1.27; 22.79]).
The quality of SBAR utilization remains low in ICU clinical practice. Pre- and post-graduate training seem to improve its quality.
Pre-graduate mandatory training associated with multiple repetitions could improve nurses' SBAR utilization. Training using the SBAR tool should be combined with the development of nursing skills in assessment and clinical judgment.
Mots-clé
Adult, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Communication, Physicians, Medical Errors, Switzerland, Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation, TeamSTEPPS, communication, critical care, telephone calls
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
10/01/2022 14:50
Dernière modification de la notice
25/02/2023 7:46
Données d'usage