A systematic review of existing data on long-term lithium therapy: neuroprotective or neurotoxic?
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F355CFDED1F6
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A systematic review of existing data on long-term lithium therapy: neuroprotective or neurotoxic?
Périodique
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN
1461-1457
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
2
Pages
269-287
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
Résumé
Lithium is an efficacious agent for the treatment of bipolar disorder, but it is unclear to what extent its long-term use may result in neuroprotective or toxic consequences. Medline was searched with the combination of the word 'Lithium' plus key words that referred to every possible effect on the central nervous system. The papers were further classified into those supporting a neuroprotective effect, those in favour of a neurotoxic effect and those that were neutral. The papers were classified into research in humans, animal and in-vitro research, case reports, and review/opinion articles. Finally, the Natural Standard evidence-based validated grading rationale was used to validate the data. The Medline search returned 970 papers up to February 2006. Inspection of the abstracts supplied 214 papers for further reviewing. Eighty-nine papers supported the neuroprotective effect (6 human research, 58 animal/in vitro, 0 case reports, 25 review/opinion articles). A total of 116 papers supported the neurotoxic effect (17 human research, 23 animal/in vitro, 60 case reports, 16 review/opinion articles). Nine papers supported no hypothesis (5 human research, 3 animal/in vitro, 0 case reports, 1 review/opinion articles). Overall, the grading suggests that the data concerning the effect of lithium therapy is that of level C, that is 'unclear or conflicting scientific evidence' since there is conflicting evidence from uncontrolled non-randomized studies accompanied by conflicting evidence from animal and basic science studies. Although more papers are in favour of the toxic effect, the great difference in the type of papers that support either hypothesis, along with publication bias and methodological issues make conclusions difficult. Lithium remains the 'gold standard' for the prophylaxis of bipolar illness, however, our review suggests that there is a rare possibility of a neurotoxic effect in real-life clinical practice even in closely monitored patients with 'therapeutic' lithium plasma levels. It is desirable to keep lithium blood levels as low as feasible with prophylaxis.
Mots-clé
Animals, Antimanic Agents/administration & dosage, Antimanic Agents/adverse effects, Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy, Bipolar Disorder/pathology, Drug Administration Schedule, Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Lithium Compounds/administration & dosage, Lithium Compounds/adverse effects, Neurons/drug effects, Neurons/pathology, Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage, Neuroprotective Agents/adverse effects, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
03/10/2009 11:27
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:20