Current practice of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): Still standardized or on the verge of diversification?

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Tous droits réservés
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F1BF5FE527C1
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Current practice of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): Still standardized or on the verge of diversification?
Périodique
European journal of surgical oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Sgarbura O., Villeneuve L., Alyami M., Bakrin N., Torrent J.J., Eveno C., Hübner M.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
ISSPP PIPAC study group
Contributeur⸱rice⸱s
Abba J., Afifi A., Mortensen M.B., Bharath G., Bhatt A., Yan So J.B., Brandl A., Ceelen W., Cortes-Guiral D., Courvoiser T., Coget J., de Hingh I.H., Delhorme J.B., Deo SSV, di Giorgio A., Dumont F., Escayola C., Ezanno A.C., Gagnière J., Galindo J., Glatz T., Jäger T., Jarra M., Katdare N., Kepenekian V., Khomyakov V.M., Kothonidis K., Laplace N., Lavoue V., Lehmann K., Lynch C., Mehta S., Moldovan B., Nissan A., Nowacki M., Orry D., Pérez G.O., Pabst U.G., Paquette B., Paskonis M., Piso P., Pocard M., Rau B., Reymond M., Ris F., Robella M., Silvestre-Rodriguez J., Singh S., Somashekhar S.P., Soravia C., Sourrouille I., Taibi A., Tempfer C., Torkington J., Vizzielli G., Willaert W.
ISSN
1532-2157 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0748-7983
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
47
Numéro
1
Pages
149-156
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
PIPAC is a new treatment modality for peritoneal cancer which has been practiced and evaluated until very recently by few academic centers in a highly standardized manner. Encouraging oncological outcomes and the safety profile have led to widespread adoption. The aim of this study was to assess current PIPAC practice in terms of technique, treatment and safety protocol, and indications.
A standardized survey with 82 closed-ended questions was sent online to active PIPAC centers which were identified by help of PIPAC training centers and the regional distributors of the PIPAC-specific nebulizer. The survey inquired about center demographics (n = 8), technique (n = 34), treatment and safety protocol (n = 34), and indications (n = 6).
Overall, 62 out of 66 contacted PIPAC centers answered the survey (response rate 93%). 27 centers had performed >60 PIPAC procedures. A consensus higher than 70% was reached for 37 items (50%), and higher than 80% for 28 items (37.8%). The topics with the highest degree of consensus were safety and installation issues (93.5% and 80.65%) while chemotherapy and response evaluation were the least consensual topics (63.7 and 59.6%). The attitudes were not influenced by volume, PIPAC starting year, type of activity, or presence of peritoneal metastases program.
Homogeneous treatment standards of new techniques are important to guarantee safe implementation and practice but also to allow comparison between cohorts and multi-center analysis of merged data including registries. Efforts to avoid diversification of PIPAC practice include regular update of the PIPAC training curriculum, targeted research and a consensus statement.
Mots-clé
Surgery, Oncology, General Medicine, Indications, PRGS, Peritoneal metastasis, Safety, Technique, Treatment protocol, ePIPAC
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
08/10/2020 10:46
Dernière modification de la notice
17/05/2023 6:55
Données d'usage