Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 36444858_BIB_F17D44050398.pdf (8258.43 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F17D44050398
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.
Périodique
Journal of the American Heart Association
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Mizukami T., Sonck J., Sakai K., Ko B., Maeng M., Otake H., Koo B.K., Nagumo S., Nørgaard B.L., Leipsic J., Shinke T., Munhoz D., Mileva N., Belmonte M., Ohashi H., Barbato E., Johnson N.P., De Bruyne B., Collet C.
ISSN
2047-9980 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2047-9980
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
06/12/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
23
Pages
e026960
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Multicenter Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns play an essential role in the decision-making process about revascularization. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) quantifies CAD patterns as either focal or diffuse based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD patterns on acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results considered surrogates of clinical outcomes. Methods and Results This was a prospective, multicenter study of patients with hemodynamically significant CAD undergoing PCI. Motorized FFR pullbacks and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before and after PCI. Post-PCI FFR >0.90 was considered an optimal result. Focal disease was defined as PPG >0.73 (highest PPG tertile). Overall, 113 patients (116 vessels) were included. Patients with focal disease were younger than those with diffuse CAD (61.4±9.9 versus 65.1±8.7 years, P=0.042). PCI in vessels with high PPG (focal CAD) resulted in higher post-PCI FFR (0.91±0.07 in the focal group versus 0.86±0.05 in the diffuse group, P<0.001) and larger minimal stent area (6.3±2.3 mm <sup>2</sup> in focal versus 5.3±1.8 mm <sup>2</sup> in diffuse CAD, P=0.015) compared withvessels with low PPG (diffuse CAD). The PPG was associated with the change in FFR after PCI (R <sup>2</sup> =0.51, P<0.001). The PPG significantly improved the capacity to predict optimal PCI results compared with an angiographic assessment of CAD patterns (area under the curve <sub>PPG</sub> 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.88] versus area under the curve <sub>angio</sub> 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42-0.60]; P<0.001). Conclusions PCI in vessels with focal disease defined by the PPG resulted in greater improvement in epicardial conductance and larger minimal stent area compared with diffuse disease. PPG, but not angiographically defined CAD patterns, distinguished patients attaining superior procedural outcomes. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03782688.
Mots-clé
Humans, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Artery Disease/surgery, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Prospective Studies, CAD patterns, diffuse disease, percutaneous coronary interventions, pullback pressure gradient
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
05/12/2022 16:06
Dernière modification de la notice
25/01/2024 8:47
Données d'usage