Direct withdrawal of a retained foreign body bisecting the thoracic spinal canal in a neurologically intact pediatric patient: illustrative case.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 37354389_BIB_F0DF476CAF2E.pdf (682.49 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F0DF476CAF2E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Etude de cas (case report): rapporte une observation et la commente brièvement.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Direct withdrawal of a retained foreign body bisecting the thoracic spinal canal in a neurologically intact pediatric patient: illustrative case.
Périodique
Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Peters D.R., VanHorn T., Karimian B., Pruden B., Wait S.D., Daniel R.T., Tuleasca C.
ISSN
2694-1902 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2694-1902
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
19/06/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
5
Numéro
25
Pages
2363
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Nonmissile penetrating spinal cord injury (NMPSCI) with a retained foreign body (RFB) is rare and usually results in permanent neurological deficits. In extremely rare cases, patients can present without significant neurological deficits despite an RFB that traverses the spinal canal. Given the rarity of these cases, a consensus has not yet been reached on optimal management. In a patient with an RFB and a neurologically normal clinical examination, the risk of open surgical exploration may outweigh the benefit and direct withdrawal may be a better option.
A 10-year-old female suffered an NMPSCI to the thoracic spine with an RFB that bisected the spinal canal but remained neurologically intact. Direct withdrawal of the RFB was chosen instead of open surgical exploration, leading to an excellent clinical outcome. The literature was reviewed to find other examples of thoracic NMPSCI with RFB and neurologically normal examinations. Management strategies were compared.
For NMPSCI with RFB and without significant neurological deficits, direct withdrawal is a viable and possibly the best treatment option. The use of fast-acting anesthesia without intubation minimizes patient manipulation, speeds up recovery, and allows early assessment of neurological status after removal.
Mots-clé
direct withdrawal, penetrating spinal cord injury, penetrating trauma, retained foreign body, spinal stab wound
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
29/06/2023 15:03
Dernière modification de la notice
25/01/2024 8:47
Données d'usage