Standard care practices and psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing parental distress following stillbirth: A systematic narrative review

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_EDD0F78CCBEE
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Standard care practices and psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing parental distress following stillbirth: A systematic narrative review
Périodique
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Crispus-Jones H., McKenzie-McHarg K., Horsch A.
ISSN
0264-6838
ISSN-L
1469-672X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
33
Numéro
5
Pages
448-465
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Objective: To summarise and critically evaluate the evidence informing the provision of standard care practices and psychosocial interventions following stillbirth. Background: Stillbirth is increasingly recognised as a significant bereavement experience with the potential to cause substantial psychological distress for parents. Standard care practices and psychosocial interventions to support parents have undergone dramatic changes, with limited basis in evidence. Methods: A systematic narrative review was conducted of quantitative studies examining interventions designed to reduce psychological distress in parents following the loss of a stillborn baby. Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Substantial methodological weaknesses were identified among reviewed studies, including small and heterogeneous loss samples, weak study designs and lack of clarity in reported methods and outcomes. Inadequate replication of many findings substantially limits the generalisability of the evidence. Conclusion: Tentative evidence was found for the provision of mementoes of the baby and information regarding the cause of the loss, support group attendance, and cognitive behavioural interventions for parents identified with clinical levels of distress. Contradictory findings for the impact of contact with the baby prevent the formation of clear conclusions for this practice. Due to the methodological weaknesses prevalent in the research identified, the current evidence base is not considered sufficiently able to reliably inform care practices and intervention approaches. High-quality research evidence in this field is urgently required.
Mots-clé
stillbirth, perinatal loss, interventions, care, evidence-based practice, parents
Web of science
Création de la notice
05/05/2015 12:24
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:15
Données d'usage