Surgical Management and Outcomes of Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Experience from the GRECCAR Group.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_EC2EBA5D7A3C
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Surgical Management and Outcomes of Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Experience from the GRECCAR Group.
Périodique
Annals of surgical oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Doussot A., Vernerey D., Rullier E., Lefevre J.H., Meillat H., Cotte E., Piessen G., Tuech J.J., Panis Y., Mege D., Meurisse A., De Bari B., Heyd B., Lakkis Z.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR)
ISSN
1534-4681 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1068-9265
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
10/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
27
Numéro
11
Pages
4286-4293
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Synchronous prostate cancer (PC) and rectal cancer (RC) is a rare clinical situation. While combining curative-intent management for both cancers can be challenging, available data for guiding the multidisciplinary strategy are lacking.
Consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for a mid-low RC with synchronous PC treated at 9 tertiary-care centers between 2008 and 2018 were included. Management strategy and data on postoperative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
Overall, 25 patients underwent curative-intent RC resection combined with PC management. Nine (36%), 10 (40%) and 6 (24%) patients had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PC, respectively. Management mostly consisted of chemoradiotherapy combined in 18 patients (72%) with either TME in 12 patients or pelvic exenteration for resection of both cancers in 6 patients. Most patients underwent RC resection using a laparoscopic approach (n = 16, 64%). Anastomosis was performed in 18 patients (72%) of whom 13 received diverting ileostomy. The complete R0 resection rate was 96% (n = 24). The overall morbidity rate was 64% (n = 16) and 5 patients (20%) experienced severe surgical morbidity of which two died within 90 days of surgery after pelvic exenteration. Among patients with anastomosis, 2 patients (11%) experienced anastomotic leak requiring surgical management. After a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 3-year OS and RFS were 80.2% (CI 95% 58.8-92.2) and 68.6% (CI 95% 42.3-84.8), respectively.
This series is the largest to report that simultaneous curative-intent management of synchronous PC and RC is feasible and safe. Pelvic exenteration might be a better option when RC complete resection seems not achievable through TME.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
10/06/2020 20:31
Dernière modification de la notice
23/11/2020 7:24
Données d'usage