May absorbable suture anchors increase the rate of recurrent dislocations after shoulder stabilization?
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_E831B3B262A8
Type
Actes de conférence (partie): contribution originale à la littérature scientifique, publiée à l'occasion de conférences scientifiques, dans un ouvrage de compte-rendu (proceedings), ou dans l'édition spéciale d'un journal reconnu (conference proceedings).
Sous-type
Abstract (résumé de présentation): article court qui reprend les éléments essentiels présentés à l'occasion d'une conférence scientifique dans un poster ou lors d'une intervention orale.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
May absorbable suture anchors increase the rate of recurrent dislocations after shoulder stabilization?
Titre de la conférence
Annual meeting of the Swiss Society of Orthopedy and Traumatology
Adresse
Geneva, June 24-26 2009
ISBN
1424-7860
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2009
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
139
Série
Swiss Medical Weekly
Pages
12S
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Introduction: Absorbable anchors are frequently used in shoulder surgery. Mechanisms of absorption induce a local inflammatory reaction. It is not clear if this process may disturb healing of the capsule and ligaments. The purpose of the study was to compare the rate of recurrent dislocation following open shoulder stabilization when using absorbable or non-absorbable suture anchors.
Methods: Between 1999 and 2003, 83 open Bankart repairs were performed by the same surgeon. All patients had recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability. All had preoperative arthro-MRI or arthro-CT which did not reveal any significant bony Bankart lesion or rotatorcuff tear. Thirty-four patients were treated with absorbable anchors (Panalok®) and sutures (Panacryl®) and 49 with non-absorbable anchors (Mitek GII®) and sutures (Ethibond®). The same surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol were used. The incidence of sports ability and recurrent instability were recorded. We defined instability as true dislocation.
Results: Five patients on 34 were lost to follow-up in the absorbable group and 7 on 49 in the non-absorbable group. The mean age of absorbable group was 25 years (range, 17-39 years). At a mean follow-up of 66 months (range, 54-76 months), 86% could resume sports activity. Five patients on 29 (17%) reported recurrent instability and two did need revision surgery. The mean age in non-absorbable group was 28 year (range, 18-47 years). At a mean follow-up of 78 months (range, 49-82 months), 93% could resume sports activity. Three patients on 42 (7%) reported recurrent instability and one did need revision surgery.
Conclusion: This clinical study showed a clear tendency to a higher recurrence rate of dislocation when using absorbable suture anchors (17% in absorbable vs 7% in non-absorbable group). It is known that Panacryl® may be responsible for a major local inflammatory response. However, it is still unclear if this could be the failure etiology. Consequently, we prefer to use systematically non-absorbable sutureanchors for shoulder stabilization.
Methods: Between 1999 and 2003, 83 open Bankart repairs were performed by the same surgeon. All patients had recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability. All had preoperative arthro-MRI or arthro-CT which did not reveal any significant bony Bankart lesion or rotatorcuff tear. Thirty-four patients were treated with absorbable anchors (Panalok®) and sutures (Panacryl®) and 49 with non-absorbable anchors (Mitek GII®) and sutures (Ethibond®). The same surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol were used. The incidence of sports ability and recurrent instability were recorded. We defined instability as true dislocation.
Results: Five patients on 34 were lost to follow-up in the absorbable group and 7 on 49 in the non-absorbable group. The mean age of absorbable group was 25 years (range, 17-39 years). At a mean follow-up of 66 months (range, 54-76 months), 86% could resume sports activity. Five patients on 29 (17%) reported recurrent instability and two did need revision surgery. The mean age in non-absorbable group was 28 year (range, 18-47 years). At a mean follow-up of 78 months (range, 49-82 months), 93% could resume sports activity. Three patients on 42 (7%) reported recurrent instability and one did need revision surgery.
Conclusion: This clinical study showed a clear tendency to a higher recurrence rate of dislocation when using absorbable suture anchors (17% in absorbable vs 7% in non-absorbable group). It is known that Panacryl® may be responsible for a major local inflammatory response. However, it is still unclear if this could be the failure etiology. Consequently, we prefer to use systematically non-absorbable sutureanchors for shoulder stabilization.
Site de l'éditeur
Création de la notice
29/01/2010 17:25
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:11
Données d'usage
