Construction and pilot assessment of the Upper Limb Assessment in Daily Living Scale.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_E765464424E3
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Construction and pilot assessment of the Upper Limb Assessment in Daily Living Scale.
Périodique
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Rousseaux M., Bonnin-Koang H.Y., Darné B., Marque P., Parratte B., Schnitzler A., Dehail P., Bradai N., Viton J.M., Daveluy W., Yelnik A., Zadikian M., Benaïm C.
ISSN
1468-330X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0022-3050
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Volume
83
Numéro
6
Pages
594-600
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Validation Studies Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: The upper limb function of hemiplegic patients is currently evaluated using scales that assess physical capacity or daily activities under test conditions. The present scale, the Upper Limb Assessment in Daily Living (ULADL) Scale, was developed to explore the subjective and objective functional capacities of such patients in a proximal to distal sequence.
METHODS: A group of experts constructed a scale addressing 17 upper limb functions (five active passive and 12 active) which could be explored by a questionnaire (Q) and a test (T). Reproducibility, internal consistency, concurrent validity (Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA)) and learning effect were estimated in a multicentre study.
RESULTS: 49 stroke patients were each rated three times within 7 days by a total of 21 physicians, yielding a total of 142 ratings. The ULADL took 16±8 min to complete compared with 9±5 min for the RMA. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.95 for Q and 0.97 for the practical tests (T). The global Q and T scores, and in particular the global Q score, were slightly higher at the second rating. The intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.65 (95% CI (0.44 to 0.79)) for Q and 0.97 (0.95 to 0.98) for T, and the inter-rater ICC was 0.95 for both Q and T. The Bland and Altman method showed good intra- and inter-rater reliability with no systematic trend. Correlation coefficients for ULADL versus RMA were >0.80 for both Q and T.
CONCLUSIONS: The ULADL Scale has good psychometric properties and can explore patients with different degrees of upper limb impairment.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Female, Hemiplegia/complications, Hemiplegia/diagnosis, Humans, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Pilot Projects, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke/complications, Stroke/diagnosis, Upper Extremity/physiopathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/01/2016 14:16
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 17:10
Données d'usage