"Fraught with Controversy" : Organizing Expertise against Contingent Valuation

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_E4D6706102DC
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
"Fraught with Controversy" : Organizing Expertise against Contingent Valuation
Périodique
History of Political Economy
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Svorenčík Andrej , Maas Harro
ISSN
0018-2702
ISSN-L
0018-2702
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/06/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
49
Numéro
2
Pages
315-345
Langue
anglais
Résumé
This paper examines consulting and expert work performed by (experimental) economists for the Exxon Valdez litigation case. One of the issues at stake was the use of a specific method, contingent valuation, to estimate the so-called passive use value part of the damage resulting from the Exxon Valdez oil spill of March 24, 1989. Our interest is less in the possibilities of using contingent valuation to estimate passive use values as such, and more in the dynamics of consulting and expert work itself, which in litigation cases mostly remains hidden behind the veil of contracts. Because Exxon went explicitly public in the Exxon Valdez case, this veil can be partially lifted. In contrast with Public Trustees, who submitted a monetary damage estimate to the Court, Exxon decided to follow a radically different strategy: it organized an all-out assault on the method by which such a monetary estimate was most likely to be produced. That strategy cut across social and epistemic commitments of different segments of the economics discipline, raising questions about the different meanings of expertise, and the role of economists in the legal, business, and public domain. This paper aims to address these questions.

Mots-clé
Symbolic capital, ownership of data, expertise, scientific credit, business consulting, science and democracy, contingent valuation
Création de la notice
12/12/2017 10:47
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:08
Données d'usage