Economic impact of anaesthesia methods used in hand surgery: Global costs and operating room's throughput.
Détails
Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: Non spécifiée
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_E3748C21BFB7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Economic impact of anaesthesia methods used in hand surgery: Global costs and operating room's throughput.
Périodique
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
ISSN
1878-0539 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1748-6815
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
74
Numéro
9
Pages
2149-2155
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Recently, local anaesthesia has become popular among hand surgeons. We hypothesized that using the "wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet" (WALANT) approach would result in lower global costs and in an increase in the operating room (OR)'s efficiency.
All cases of carpal tunnel (CTR) and trigger finger releases (TFR) performed over 2016 and 2017 were divided into four groups, following which the anaesthesia method was used. Total OR occupation time, surgical time and the "all but surgery" time were analysed. A common minimum bill per anaesthesia was generated.
WALANT or local anaesthesia and tourniquet increase the OR's throughput by having shorter operation room occupation times than other methods (17.5-33%). Costs of the two procedures are reduced by 21-31% when using local anaesthesia methods.
Preferring those techniques for CTR and TFR has a notable beneficial impact on the costs and on the OR's efficiency. This effect is more evident on short surgical procedures. LOE: Level of evidence III, economic analysis.
All cases of carpal tunnel (CTR) and trigger finger releases (TFR) performed over 2016 and 2017 were divided into four groups, following which the anaesthesia method was used. Total OR occupation time, surgical time and the "all but surgery" time were analysed. A common minimum bill per anaesthesia was generated.
WALANT or local anaesthesia and tourniquet increase the OR's throughput by having shorter operation room occupation times than other methods (17.5-33%). Costs of the two procedures are reduced by 21-31% when using local anaesthesia methods.
Preferring those techniques for CTR and TFR has a notable beneficial impact on the costs and on the OR's efficiency. This effect is more evident on short surgical procedures. LOE: Level of evidence III, economic analysis.
Mots-clé
Anaesthesia, Costs, Economy, Hand surgery, Wide awake
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
26/01/2021 14:15
Dernière modification de la notice
26/07/2023 6:00