Priorities, actions and risks in the COVID-19 pandemic: a flash SoMe survey among surgical oncologists.
Détails
Cette publication est une ancienne version. Cette notice est remplacée par serval:BIB_948B46A393AB
Télécharger: 10.1515_pp-2020-0142.pdf (587.23 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_E28B55BC3716
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Priorities, actions and risks in the COVID-19 pandemic: a flash SoMe survey among surgical oncologists.
Périodique
Pleura and peritoneum
ISSN
2364-768X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2364-768X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
6
Numéro
1
Pages
7-12
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Corona virus-induced disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has globally affected the surgical treatment of cancer patients and has challenged the ethical principles of surgical oncologists around the world. Not only treatment but also diagnosis and follow-up have been disrupted.
An online survey was sent through Twitter and by the surgical societies worldwide. The survey consisted of 29 closed-ended questions and was conducted over a period of 24 days beginning in March 26, 2020.
Overall, 394 surgical oncologists from 41 different countries answered the questionnaire. The predominant guiding principle was "saving lives" 240 (62%), and the different aspects of lock-down found hence large support (mean 7.1-9.3 out of 10). Shut-down of elective surgery and modification of cancer care found a mean support of 7.0 ± 3.0 and 5.8 ± 3.1, respectively. Modification of cancer care longer than two weeks was considered unacceptable to 114 (29%) responders. Hundred and fifty six (40%) and 138 (36%) expect "return to normal" beyond six months for surgical practice and cancer care, respectively.
Surgical oncologists show strong and long-lasting support for lock-down measures aiming to save lives. The impact of the pandemic on surgical oncology is perceived controversially, but the majority was forced already now to accept what is inacceptable for many of their colleagues.
An online survey was sent through Twitter and by the surgical societies worldwide. The survey consisted of 29 closed-ended questions and was conducted over a period of 24 days beginning in March 26, 2020.
Overall, 394 surgical oncologists from 41 different countries answered the questionnaire. The predominant guiding principle was "saving lives" 240 (62%), and the different aspects of lock-down found hence large support (mean 7.1-9.3 out of 10). Shut-down of elective surgery and modification of cancer care found a mean support of 7.0 ± 3.0 and 5.8 ± 3.1, respectively. Modification of cancer care longer than two weeks was considered unacceptable to 114 (29%) responders. Hundred and fifty six (40%) and 138 (36%) expect "return to normal" beyond six months for surgical practice and cancer care, respectively.
Surgical oncologists show strong and long-lasting support for lock-down measures aiming to save lives. The impact of the pandemic on surgical oncology is perceived controversially, but the majority was forced already now to accept what is inacceptable for many of their colleagues.
Mots-clé
COVID-19, priorities, surgical oncology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
10/02/2021 13:48
Dernière modification de la notice
30/10/2023 8:52