Minimally invasive fixation versus conservative treatment of undisplaced scaphoid fractures: a cost-effectiveness study.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_E0B34C687AA8
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Minimally invasive fixation versus conservative treatment of undisplaced scaphoid fractures: a cost-effectiveness study.
Périodique
Journal of Hand Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Papaloizos M.Y., Fusetti C., Christen T., Nagy L., Wasserfallen J.B.
ISSN
0266-7681
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2004
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
29
Numéro
2
Pages
116-119
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study
Résumé
This study compares the direct and indirect costs of conservative and minimally invasive treatment for undisplaced scaphoid fractures. Costs data concerning groups of non-operated and operated patients were analysed. Direct costs were higher in operated patients. Although highly variable, indirect costs were significantly smaller in operated patients and the total costs were higher in non-operated patients. In conclusion, operative treatment of scaphoid fractures is initially more expensive than conservative treatment but markedly decreases the work compensation costs.
Mots-clé
Adult, Casts, Surgical, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Fracture Fixation, Internal/economics, Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods, Fractures, Bone/economics, Fractures, Bone/therapy, Humans, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)/economics, Physical Therapy Modalities, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Scaphoid Bone/injuries, Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive/economics, Switzerland, Workers' Compensation
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
14/03/2008 11:20
Dernière modification de la notice
02/05/2023 6:54
Données d'usage